Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?

[Venturi Swirl]

Did Brenda have the right to accuse the McCanns of being murderers (repeatedly) on social media?

[slartibartfast]

Did Brenda have the right to accuse the McCanns of being murderers (repeatedly) on social media?

Cite.

[Venturi Swirl]

Cite.

Here’s one as a taster, let me know how many more you require.
Tue Sep 23 15:52:38 " ooh I say " have you been in any Carry on Films, e.g. " Carry on #mccann s, murder at will

[Erngath]

Did Brenda have the right to accuse the McCanns of being murderers (repeatedly) on social media?

She felt she had the right .
Surely no-one has the right to do so.

[Erngath]

Here’s one as a taster, let me know how many more you require.
Tue Sep 23 15:52:38 " ooh I say " have you been in any Carry on Films, e.g. " Carry on #mccann s, murder at will

 

[Robittybob1]

Here’s one as a taster, let me know how many more you require.
Tue Sep 23 15:52:38 " ooh I say " have you been in any Carry on Films, e.g. " Carry on #mccann s, murder at will

Reads more like fiction than fact.

[G-Unit]

An interesting question in my opinion is why Sky chose to reveal this story. Was it to pressurise the police into acting against those in the dossier or did they know that the police had decided no crime had been committed?

Whatever the answer, they pursued a woman who hadn't broken the law.

When a man who fundraised for the Fund and who wrote a blog saying some pretty nasty things about others was convicted of viewing child porn Sky took no notice at all.

[Erngath]

An interesting question in my opinion is why Sky chose to reveal this story. Was it to pressurise the police into acting against those in the dossier or did they know that the police had decided no crime had been committed?

Whatever the answer, they pursued a woman who hadn't broken the law.

When a man who fundraised for the Fund and who wrote a blog saying some pretty nasty things about others was convicted of viewing child porn Sky took no notice at all.

When a sceptic was convicted of the dreadful neglect of her elderly parents Sky took no notice at all.
Possibly there are other sceptics and supporters with convictions which Sky has not publlicized.
Possibly Sky were not aware of these convictions.

[Mr Gray]

An interesting question in my opinion is why Sky chose to reveal this story. Was it to pressurise the police into acting against those in the dossier or did they know that the police had decided no crime had been committed?

Whatever the answer, they pursued a woman who hadn't broken the law.

When a man who fundraised for the Fund and who wrote a blog saying some pretty nasty things about others was convicted of viewing child porn Sky took no notice at all.

His conviction  had nothing to do with the mccanns

[Erngath]

His conviction  had nothing to do with the mccanns

Nor had the woman who was convicted of appalling neglect, her conviction was unrelated to the McCanns But her campaign against the McCanns was reprehensible.

[G-Unit]

His conviction  had nothing to do with the mccanns

His online behaviour in support of the McCanns was as reprehensible as the behaviour of those collected in the dossier imo. If their 'trolling' was newsworthy then so was his.

[slartibartfast]

Nor had the woman who was convicted of appalling neglect, her conviction was unrelated to the McCanns But her campaign against the McCanns was reprehensible

Very little about her case online at all.

[Mr Gray]

His online behaviour in support of the McCanns was as reprehensible as the behaviour of those collected in the dossier imo. If their 'trolling' was newsworthy then so was his.

Then if you feel that way you need to compile a dossier and take it to the police

[G-Unit]

Then if you feel that way you need to compile a dossier and take it to the police

As we know, the police don't see bad behaviour online as criminal behaviour. I'm not interested in compiling dossiers on anyone and those who were/are were unable to understand the difference.

[Mr Gray]

As we know, the police don't see bad behaviour online as criminal behaviour. I'm not interested in compiling dossiers on anyone and those who were/are were unable to understand the difference.

I respect the right of anyone to report a suspected crime... That's the difference  between us