We know. It's rather shocking how one can become deluded into all sorts, isn't it? The podcast and joint theories, which have been firmly denied in discussion with Ms Lean as delusional, or is that mistaken? Or is Ms Lean back on board? Or of never being removed from that of JF not being on this bike, that he cut his hair off to look like someone else? Off with the evidence to a scrapyard and as you say "hey presto' gone? After all, she has only recently stated that JF gave a wrong description of himself? Perhaps she was on board with your theories after all. Whose theory came first here though? Yours/CM/SL?
Ignore the mad theories for Just a moment, they appear to have overtaken every part of rational? These claims to solving a case in their multiplication of fallacy. A boy cutting off his hair to look like the killer? Really?
It's not as bizarre as you might think. If he was never on that bike and I don't think he was, cutting his hair off wasn't going to get him arrested (and didn't of course), because he wasn't there and will have had an alibi on the night it happened and none of his DNA would be found obviously. Interesting that DNA belonging to SK was found and further down the line JF's, but zero from either of the 2 meant to have been on the moped. There is in fact NOTHING to prove GD and JF were up that path at all apart from their claims that they were. I do think though that GD was driving it with someone else on the back though, but not JF. JF was a "red herring", imo he shaved his own hair off so that he could claim it was him on the moped to avoid the real person being identified because that person also had short hair.
Consider this. Everyone knows GD and JF were less than helpful to the Court... "we don't remember anything about that day"......"we don't know where we were when the moped was seen at the V"....."we don't know why the moped disappeared without trace". They weren't credible witnesses so their claim to being the people on the moped is not credible either.
As for my theory coming before Sandra's well no I'm not going to claim that, but as you say, there have been various things said over the past 2 or 3 years about whether it was GD and JF on that moped, but never a huge amount of discussion about it. The more I've analysed this case in detail, the more I've thought Mitchell didn't do it and the more I've thought all the lies told by other people are covering something up. Trying to decipher what is being covered up exactly is no easy task obviously, but none of these witnesses connected in some way to J gave statements which sounded believable. Some of them were even jaw dropping like ..."we don't know what we were doing when the moped was at the V".
When the search party went to look for J they walked up a creepy dark path to look for her with torches but walked right past someone's house Jodi had been found in 2 months earlier when she hadn't come back when she was supposed to. That is most definitely suspect. Nobody would do that, they would knock that door and ask if she was there. They also didn't phone around other possible places she could have been apart from the Gran's. Nobody would do that either. You would phone everyone first, even if you did it whilst walking to the path. They never phoned them at all. Far from LM "knowing where the body was", the above indicates very strongly that someone had already told Ju Jones Jody was dead behind the V up the path. The first place anyone would look would be the house she was found in the last time. You wouldn't walk right past the front door which they did and walk up a creepy path in pitch dark.
To be blunt, I find it utterly staggering that the above was not viewed by the Police as highly suspect. Although I think everyone knows by now they messed up this whole investigation from the start by contaminating the crime scene for 7 hours.
