Shane Mitchell’s whereabouts during the course of the entire evening?

[Nicholas]

All those people choosing to back this innocence fraud grift have no idea where exactly killer Luke Mitchell was all night after he had committed his murder (apart from the sightings of witnesses who saw him at certain times), or where exactly  Corinne Mitchell was that night and what exactly she was doing

Same applies to former  Shane Mitchell

[Nicholas]

Still nothing on killer Luke Mitchell’s other missing bike - which without doubt him and his mother and brother would have been asked various questions about by the police

What was killer Luke Mitchell and Shane and Corinne Mitchell’s evidence regarding the push bikes?

And does anyone know what  Corinne Mitchell and  Shane Mitchell told the police about Kim Thomson?

https://www.theguardian.com/uk/2004/dec/31/1

Did the Mitchell’s ghost Kim T like the Hall family did with Stephanie Bon?

Part 9
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/12/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9%ef%b8%8f/

Part 9a
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/14/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9%ef%b8%8f-2/

Part 9b
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2022/05/20/quite-a-hall-tale-part-9c%ef%b8%8f/

[Nicholas]

I believe he can't speak out because he knows what happened

What does Shane Mitchell have to say about his  brother, mother Corinne Mitchell and Sandra Lean and Scott Forbes various smear campaigns over all these years?

”When toxic types can’t control the way you see yourself, they start to control how others see you; they play the martyr while you’re labeled the toxic one. A smear campaign is a preemptive strike to sabotage your reputation and slander your name so that you won’t have a support network to fall back on lest you decide to detach and cut ties with this toxic person. They may even stalk and harass you or the people you know as a way to supposedly “expose” the truth about you; this exposure acts as a way to hide their own abusive behavior while projecting it onto you.

Bringing in the opinion, perspective or suggested threat of another person into the dynamic of an interaction is known as “triangulation.” Often used to validate the toxic person’s abuse while invalidating the victim’s reactions to abuse, triangulation can also work to manufacture love triangles that leave you feeling unhinged and insecure.

Malignant narcissists love to triangulate their significant other with strangers, co-workers, ex-partners, friends and even family members in order to evoke jealousy and uncertainty in you. They also use the opinions of others to validate their point of view.

This is a diversionary tactic meant to pull your attention away from their abusive behavior and into a false image of them as a desirable, sought after person. It also leaves you questioning yourself – if Mary did agree with Tom, doesn’t that mean that you must be wrong? The truth is, narcissists love to “report back” falsehoods about others say about you, when in fact, they are the ones smearing you.
https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,8086.msg383172.html#msg383172

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

Now Lamberton is having another go at Shanes memory. He states "Imagine folks,two days after the murder he couldn't even remember Luke making the dinner that afternoon"

Yes, imagine! 2 days after the murder? we were all shocked. We were all traumatised. Remembering whether his brother made dinner or not doesn't actually spring to mind as an important thing!

And again, their double standards......2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Yes, It was to turn into a very important thing afterwards but not 2 days afterwards. It is easy for those to condem......when they haven't been in that particular situation!

http://forum.wronglyaccusedperson.org.uk/series-on-cases-from-sandra-leans-book-no-smoke/the-lm-alibi-offered-at-trial-was-it-necessary-has-it-obstructed-justice/msg10824/#msg10824

Why would liar Shane Mitchell have been ‘traumatised’ ?

How many times did Shane Mitchell meet [Name removed]?

And what exactly did Shane tell police about the times he met [Name removed] - presuming he met her on the odd occasion

Shane Mitchell knew there were ‘errors’ in his first statements - at no time did Shane put these ‘errors’ down to being ‘traumatised’!

Shane Mitchell claimed he had memory problems due to previous drug addiction

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Corinne Mitchell did not/and does not appear to recognise the fact that [Name removed] was AW’s grand-daughter

whereas [Name removed] was a stranger to liar Shane Mitchell

Ergo AW’s emotions would have been very different to liar Shane Mitchell’s at that time

Liar Corinne Mitchell appeared to be suggesting her lying son Shane Mitchell’s memory of events were suppressed due to his emotions around that time

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell

Now Lamberton is having another go at Shanes memory. He states "Imagine folks,two days after the murder he couldn't even remember Luke making the dinner that afternoon"

Yes, imagine! 2 days after the murder? we were all shocked. We were all traumatised. Remembering whether his brother made dinner or not doesn't actually spring to mind as an important thing! And again, their double standards......2 days after the murder AW couldn't remember what she was wearing!! You can't condem one for their memory and not the other

Yes, It was to turn into a very important thing afterwards but not 2 days afterwards. It is easy for those to condem......when they haven't been in that particular situation!

Liar Corinne Mitchell appeared to be suggesting her lying son Shane Mitchell’s memory of events were suppressed due to his emotions around that time

This is the same Shane Mitchell who’s only involvement that day was alleged to have been giving his 14 year old brother his torch at around approximately 10:40pm that night

That’s it - according to the innocence fraud narrative

Did Shane Mitchell go to work on the Tuesday the 1st of July 2003?

[Nicholas]

Corinne Mitchell - 8th April 2010

“there is no "black and white" answer to this question and not just one reason why we went with findlay to appeal.
We were in  complete shock at the guilty verdict. findlay assured us it would go to appeal. when you are in shock you don't think or act rationally”

Hmm

[Nicholas]

Sandra Lean
GD gave an account of a "yellow framed push bike" against the school railings at the junction of the paths - no-one else - not the dog walkers, the cyclist, the young couple walking earlier, or even JF himself mentioned this bike. I'll continue this n my next post. https://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg386888.html#msg386888

Would that be the same “young couple walking earlier” con artist Sandra Lean attempted to pretend was killer Luke Mitchell and [Name removed] here https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=iCsiViNiPGA

 

[Mr Apples]

Who or what is the source of SM being spotted in Oxgangs on the night of the murder? I have only ever read about it on here. Nowhere else. I don't doubt he was seen in the aforementioned area, but I would just like to be directed to the source of this info. Anyone?

[Nicholas]

Who or what is the source of SM being spotted in Oxgangs on the night of the murder? I have only ever read about it on here. Nowhere else. I don't doubt he was seen in the aforementioned area, but I would just like to be directed to the source of this info. Anyone?

Did it come direct from Shane Mitchell?


Corrine Mitchell
“When I got home I went directly to the kitchen where I was confronted by Luke brandishing the broccoli! He asked if it should be that colour (it was turning yellowy) and I said no......bin the broccoli! He decided on beans instead...as it was a Monday and I do my weekly shop on a Tuesday there wasn't any other fresh vegetables left.

Both Luke and I served up. I told Luke to shout Shane down as he was upstairs. Shane came down, complained to Luke he had burnt the pie, I told him it could be scraped off, it wasn't that bad. Shane returned upstairs armed with his dinner. Luke ate his in front of the TV and I decided to have mine on the patio as I had been cooped up in my office all day and not seen any sun.

After eating dinner I was preparing to do the dishes when Luke came into the kitchen and said that that was him off. I joked with him and said.....don't tell me ...your seeing Jodi....as by this time Jodi had become more favourable than the cadets. I also suggested to him that he introduced his clothes to the washing machine as he had worn them for a couple of days. I got the usual teenage response......Och mum!.....and "this is Jodi’s favourite t-shirt" I replied it wouldn't be much longer if it didn't get washed and with that I got another "Och".....I'm off, see you later!

Shane came and went most of the evening, which I found quite irritating! I had stopped smoking, due to pressure from Shane, and had discovered that tracking and smoking don't go as it involves a lot of running, but by this time I was having the odd sneaky one due to pressure at work. This is our busiest time. Every time I went to "light up" Shane appeared and nearly caught me. Then just as I was safe in the knowledge that Shane was engrossed in his computer......Lit up fag.......Luke comes in.......I never got a sneaky cig that night. The rest is on the time~line. Hope this helps.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg22813.html#msg22813
[/quote]

[Nicholas]

Did it come direct from Shane Mitchell?

Repeated by scammers Sandra Lean and/or Corinne Mitchell?

[faithlilly]

Who or what is the source of SM being spotted in Oxgangs on the night of the murder? I have only ever read about it on here. Nowhere else. I don't doubt he was seen in the aforementioned area, but I would just like to be directed to the source of this info. Anyone?

Why don’t you doubt, or at least question, it if you’ve never seen any evidence of it?

[Nicholas]

For many, SM’s failure to corroborate his younger brother’s alibi was one of the most salient pieces of evidence pointing towards LM’s guilt. Despite this, there doesn’t appear to be much information in the public domain regarding SM’s whereabouts that evening, after his infamous internet session between 1650 - 1716 hrs. The only info that does seem to be available around the issue of his whereabouts in the evening is that he left the house shortly after LM did (at approx 1730/1740 hrs) and, according to CM, he was in and out of the house quite a lot that evening (which CM said was a tad annoying as she was trying to have a fly cigarette, after telling her boys she had quit smoking; she mentions this in a podcast). The only other thing that has been mentioned with regards to SM’s whereabouts after 1730 hrs is that he was caught out lying/fabricating about where he had been that night and that he was allegedly, at one point that evening, 7 miles away somewhere filling his car with petrol.Why so far away? We know that he was in the house at 2240 as he had given LM a torch to go out searching for Jodi with (along with the dog, Mia). But, what was he doing over the entire course of that evening? A lot of focus was placed upon CM as possibly the person who was burning blood-stained, forensically incriminating clothing belonging to her son LM in the Mitchells’ log burner. But, could it have been SM solely who was the person burning said clothing? I did read very recently on a youtube comment (not the most reliable source, admittedly) that, in addition to fires being lit in the Mitchells’ garden at 1830 and 2200, there was another sighting of burning taking place in their garden at 0200 on 01.07.03 (in which case, it would have to have been SM doing this, since CM & LM were being questioned at the police station at this time). Or was it a joint effort by the two? Were their clothes tested? Were they smelling of smoke? More to the point, which other aspects of the case was SM cross-examined about or what evidence about him was led at court that was separate from his porn site/car site session?

I would really appreciate your input on this one, preferably with cites.

Thanks.

Who or what is the source of SM being spotted in Oxgangs on the night of the murder? I have only ever read about it on here. Nowhere else. I don't doubt he was seen in the aforementioned area, but I would just like to be directed to the source of this info. Anyone?

Didn’t Shane Mitchell visit with a Gary Coyle and a Mr Beveridge that evening? (Shane Mitchell’s evidence during trial)

[Nicholas]

Didn’t Shane Mitchell visit with a Gary Coyle and a Mr Beveridge that evening?

According to scammer Sandra Lean she stated of Shane Mitchell “…he went to work, came home, had dinner and changed before going out to see a friend” page 303

Which friend Sandra - Mr Coyle or Mr Beveridge?

She also states;

“It would not be until the early hours of the following morning that the seriousness of the situation became known to Shane – Corinne and Luke were in the police station throughout the night with no means of contacting anyone until Corinne was able to call and ask Shane to bring some clothes for Luke.
p.303

Why didn’t Shane Mitchell go to the police station with Corinne Mitchell in the early hours of the morning of the 1st July 2003 - around 12:40am - 1:00am?

Wouldn’t Shane Mitchell have known about the “seriousness of the situation” by 10:40pm (going by the killers timings & nonsense) when he learned 14 year old Jodi Jones was missing?

Jodi Jones was meant to have met with his brother at around just gone 4:50pm

She had asthma and didn’t have a mobile phone
She didn’t have a mobile phone with her

[Mr Apples]

Did it come direct from Shane Mitchell?


Corrine Mitchell
“When I got home I went directly to the kitchen where I was confronted by Luke brandishing the broccoli! He asked if it should be that colour (it was turning yellowy) and I said no......bin the broccoli! He decided on beans instead...as it was a Monday and I do my weekly shop on a Tuesday there wasn't any other fresh vegetables left.

Both Luke and I served up. I told Luke to shout Shane down as he was upstairs. Shane came down, complained to Luke he had burnt the pie, I told him it could be scraped off, it wasn't that bad. Shane returned upstairs armed with his dinner. Luke ate his in front of the TV and I decided to have mine on the patio as I had been cooped up in my office all day and not seen any sun.

After eating dinner I was preparing to do the dishes when Luke came into the kitchen and said that that was him off. I joked with him and said.....don't tell me ...your seeing Jodi....as by this time Jodi had become more favourable than the cadets. I also suggested to him that he introduced his clothes to the washing machine as he had worn them for a couple of days. I got the usual teenage response......Och mum!.....and "this is Jodi’s favourite t-shirt" I replied it wouldn't be much longer if it didn't get washed and with that I got another "Och".....I'm off, see you later!

Shane came and went most of the evening, which I found quite irritating! I had stopped smoking, due to pressure from Shane, and had discovered that tracking and smoking don't go as it involves a lot of running, but by this time I was having the odd sneaky one due to pressure at work. This is our busiest time. Every time I went to "light up" Shane appeared and nearly caught me. Then just as I was safe in the knowledge that Shane was engrossed in his computer......Lit up fag.......Luke comes in.......I never got a sneaky cig that night. The rest is on the time~line. Hope this helps.
http://jeremybamberforum.co.uk/index.php/topic,551.msg22813.html#msg22813

It's common knowledge that SM was out and about that evening and, according to CM, he was in and out of the family home that night, too. Was it common for SM to be in and out of the family home after work? Anyway, no forum, including the JB forum, mentions SM being in Oxgangs, and nor does any newspaper. Even SL makes no mention of it, even in her books. So, who is the source of the info?

Interestingly, someone on the YT comments section said that there was a fire spotted in the Mitchell garden in the early hours (at approx 0100/0200 hrs) of 01.07.03. Was SM disposing incriminating evidence during the course of the evening of 30.06.03 and during the early hours of 01.07.03?

Btw, who is your source regarding SM visiting those two friends on 30.06.03?