Maybe it would cut your work load down by a massive amount if you researched the differences in trial for people who plead guilty to not guilty
I have said over and over. Justsaying has given you lots of time explaining and today Stephanie also reminded you
For some reason you are fixated on CJ . Is that a deflection tactic so you don't have to face the other very good points put to you today?
I keep saying I do not know the law and what happens at trials...
But we clearly have information here that casts doubt on whether or not Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna Yeates ... And on what possible day that could be....
I'm not trying to use deflection tactics, I am trying to establish a timeline, that make sense, a timeline based on what people have stated in documentaries, and what was stated at The Leveson....
My God.... even you shouldn't be happy that someones in prison just on there sayso, when the evidence doesn't support that being the case......
take the ASDA CCTV... The damning footage that suggest he was having a crisis according to the text message.... CCTV footage from Friday 17th December 2010 whether there is a time stamp or not in this footage.... there is a date...
So telling his girlfriend he is bored, and gone INNOCENTLY shopping that evening without anything untoward taking place now sound more probable.....
He could have Mis typed Crisps... and ended up with Crisis...
If Joanna Yeates isn't killed or deposited on Longwood lane until the 18th December 2010, as the statements suggest... Then the shopping trip is irrelevant.... "Crisis" is irrelevant.... Because he IS Innocently shopping on that day.....
And Joanna Yeates body doesn't get moved to Longwood lane until the 18th December 2010 at the very earliest....
So it does matter to me that CJ is not at trial.... It should matter to everyone.... Because what have you now got of Dr Vincent Tabaks story?? Something that is not true or even possible....
So if the entire story on the stand is a huge LIE... Then just because someone says they did said crime, should have evidence to back said story up as I keep stating.....
What did Clegg actually look at in this case?? It beggars me....
so the idea, that Dr Vincent Tabak has subconciously typed "Crisis" because that is what is on his mind.... And the purchase of Rock salt as Ann Redrop has stated... makes it appear, that these two events are connected to A Murder....
When it couldn't be further from the truth.....
If as I am saying you establish that Saturday the 18th December 2010 is the relevant day.....
I think maybe more to the point should be why are you happy to accept what Dr Vincent Tabak stated on the stand.... why are you happy to accept he killed Joanna Yeates..... Just on his say so??? Without evidence to support this....
Why is Ann Reddrop happy to state in a documentary that Dr Vincent Tabak going shopping to ASDA in Bedminster is "Frankly Weird"...
She is happy to accept Dr Vincent Tabak tale on the stand... a story that is a LIE.... Where we can see the most likely day has to be Saturday 18th December 2010 making the shopping trip nothing to do with anything......
She is happy to support that tale on the stand as evidence , when statements we know do not.....
What the hell is going on here...... !!!
You cannot just go around accepting someone guilty plea to something if the evidence doesn't support it....
She should be experienced enough to know that .... After all she was at that time in 2010/2011 The HEAD OF THE COMPLEX CASE UNIT!!!!!!
