The Defence Will State Their Case

[mrswah]

Tabak did not confess in interview - he confessed nothing to police at all, so it does not really matter what technique they used, if any! He made a confession freely to the prison chaplain after requesting to see him. He then went onto admit his crime in front of a jury 

I don't agree---whether he is guilty or innocent, I think it does matter what technique was used.

[mrswah]

Dont worry mrswah I wont post again. Anyone who can post on a forum saying  a sex offender should not be charged over disgusting images of children really doesnt deserve my time. Just like slating everyone connected to the murder...just not the murderer!

Nobody on this forum would support a sex offender, Jixy.  The only question is, was VT really one.

[mrswah]

People on this thread not only have a pretty warped view of how the law works but also a pretty warped view on how child sex offenders should be treated! 

Wouldn't agree that I have a "warped view".   i'm surprised that you are relying on media reports !

[justsaying]

I don't agree---whether he is guilty or innocent, I think it does matter what technique was used.

It would only matter if the technique led him to confess! He did not confess anything in interview, under caution or otherwise. He asked to speak to the chaplain and then freely confessed to him, not that it mattered as he had already confessed to his lawyers prior to him speaking to the chaplain.

You do not even know if they used any technique, it is all just guess work on your behalf. The fact is he did not confess to police, in fact he tried to blame someone else!

[justsaying]

Wouldn't agree that I have a "warped view".   i'm surprised that you are relying on media reports !

Firstly, denying that such photographs exist is an insult to the poor victims who featured in those photographs!

Secondly, the guardian is a trusted newspaper, which I have said to you before!

[justsaying]

Nobody on this forum would support a sex offender, Jixy.  The only question is, was VT really one.

Yes he is one! He admitted his guilt on this charge also!

[Caroline]

And, there is nothing funny about this case, whether VT is innocent or not!

Nothing funny about the case no, however, I find some of these theories laughable. It's how I feel or would you like me to lie about it and humour ridiculous comments? Plenty is made about some of the crazy stuff put forward on the Bamber site - this thread is no better - in fact it's worse because the guy isn't even claiming to be innocent. I was prepared to not comment at all however, the 'bye Caroline' Comment from the Fliegender Jäger was meant to goad.

There is also denial of pedophilic images found on Tabak'c computer - now THAT is bad tatse!

[Caroline]

Nobody on this forum would support a sex offender, Jixy.  The only question is, was VT really one.

Why would he have those images if he wasn't?

[justsaying]

Nothing funny about the case no, however, I find some of these theories laughable. It's how I feel or would you like me to lie about it and humour ridiculous comments? Plenty is made about some of the crazy stuff put forward on the Bamber site - this thread is no better - in fact it's worse because the guy isn't even claiming to be innocent. I was prepared to not comment at all however, the 'bye Caroline' Comment from the Fliegender Jäger was meant to goad.

There is also denial of pedophilic images found on Tabak'c computer - now THAT is bad tatse!

Very bad taste.

[Caroline]

It would only matter if the technique led him to confess! He did not confess anything in interview, under caution or otherwise. He asked to speak to the chaplain and then freely confessed to him, not that it mattered as he had already confessed to his lawyers prior to him speaking to the chaplain.

You do not even know if they used any technique, it is all just guess work on your behalf. The fact is he did not confess to police, in fact he tried to blame someone else!

Exasperating isn't it?

[jixy]

Exasperating isn't it?

But our posts get amended but theirs dont. What a joke!

[justsaying]

Exasperating isn't it?

I read this thread and often think just what it would take for people to accept his guilt...

DNA - Nope!
Victims blood - Nope!
Fiber evidence - Nope!
Internet searches - Nope!
A sound confession - Nope!

Even denying the fact he is a paedophile when he has confessed to that too! The case against this vile man is one of the strongest I have ever come across.

[mrswah]

But our posts get amended but theirs dont. What a joke!

Who are "they"?

[mrswah]

One thing I don't understand:  if VT had child porn on his computer, why wasn't he tried for this at the same time as he was tried for murdering Joanna Yeates?  After all, possession of child porn is a crime; possession of other porn isnt.

[mrswah]

Nothing funny about the case no, however, I find some of these theories laughable. It's how I feel or would you like me to lie about it and humour ridiculous comments? Plenty is made about some of the crazy stuff put forward on the Bamber site - this thread is no better - in fact it's worse because the guy isn't even claiming to be innocent. I was prepared to not comment at all however, the 'bye Caroline' Comment from the Fliegender Jäger was meant to goad.

There is also denial of pedophilic images found on Tabak'c computer - now THAT is bad tatse!

Yes, Caroline, I agree about the goading comment, which is why I have removed it.