Author Topic: The Defence Will State Their Case  (Read 599997 times)

0 Members and 9 Guests are viewing this topic.

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4275 on: May 13, 2019, 04:37:49 PM »
The simple fact that people from different countries understand terms differently is extremely important to this case... I could write my my local dialect and you wouldn't know what the Hell I was saying!

And that applies to many things... context country, regional dialect... etc etc...

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4276 on: May 13, 2019, 04:41:51 PM »
No just yours!

But it is my interpretation of what you mean by that...

But in the dictionary..

yours
pronoun UK ​  /jɔːz/ US ​  /jʊrz/
yours pronoun (PERSON/PEOPLE ADDRESSED)

A2 the one(s) belonging to or connected with the person or group of people being spoken or written to:

Is this pen yours?
Unfortunately my legs aren't as long as yours.
I've got something of yours (= that belongs to you).
Yours is the room on the top floor, on the left.

B1 used at the beginning of some phrases written at the end of a letter, before giving a name:

Yours, Jack
Yours faithfully/sincerely, K. Maxwell.
More examples

Do you consider him a friend of yours?
Who works in the office next to yours?
That aftershave of yours is smelling out the whole house.
Sorry, I stupidly forgot to bring my copy of the report - could I look at yours?
There's an old pair of shoes of yours lying in the bottom of the wardrobe.


i took it that you meant that Dr Vincent Tabak belonged to me in some way, ie.. a relative or friend..

Offline Caroline

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4277 on: May 13, 2019, 04:43:47 PM »
Why do you keep asking about where I stand on that subject...  Why is it relevant...??

The content of the porn searches has been described in many ways, and as the porn wasn't seen as relevant at trial, it cannot have been illegal..

The series mentioned by the media was a series of Porn called 'Sex and Submission".. which I posted about long ago and was a pay to view series on the adult channel I believe...

So whether or not I have an opinion on porn, isn't relevant to a Murder that a man went to trial for...

Or is that the point.... Was it supposed to sway the jury even more??


Edit... In England the jury are made up of a variety of people from all faiths and back grounds, If you are on the electoral role, you can be called at any time, I believe....

We do not have a system like they do in America, when they know about each juror and what maybe they may vote like, where they appear, I glean, to pick and chooses which Juror they want to keep... ( I do not know this as fact.. I state I glean this)

In England once you are picked as a juror, that is it, there needs to be a bloody good reason why you cannot be on a particular jury... Otherwise, it's whoever is in court at that time...

So you may end up with a jury of 12 people whom are NOT religious... So it wouldn't really be a morality issue, if it could be seen as a morality issue..

So maybe you cannot apply the same tactics in an English court room that you could apply in an American court room..

Your man Tabak was given extra time for having 145 filthy, disgusting images of children - so they were indeed illegal. You don't think there is anything wrong with that? They were bad enough to have him placed on the sex offenders register - that's bad!

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4278 on: May 13, 2019, 04:52:48 PM »
infamy... That was the other day.....

Now I'm laughing as I was thinking about it...

Imfamy Imfamy, they've got in in for me...  @)(++(* @)(++(*

It's a crap  but funny joke from a the carry on series of films...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhF32XC_7vc

Forgot about all the innuendo's... "Bristols"... means Boobs,  breasts, titties, whatever else you wish to call them..


jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4279 on: May 13, 2019, 04:54:47 PM »
infamy... That was the other day.....

Now I'm laughing as I was thinking about it...

Imfamy Imfamy, they've got in in for me...  @)(++(* @)(++(*

It's a crap  but funny joke from a the carry on series of films...

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JhF32XC_7vc

Forgot about all the innuendo's... "Bristols"... means Boobs,  breasts, titties, whatever else you wish to call them..

excuse me..you attacked me for making you feel guilty when I never asked a question about how you feel about the porn. Caroline is  back now but you have failed to reply to her? strange

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4280 on: May 13, 2019, 04:55:44 PM »
Your man Tabak was given extra time for having 145 filthy, disgusting images of children - so they were indeed illegal. You don't think there is anything wrong with that? They were bad enough to have him placed on the sex offenders register - that's bad!

The image amount changed for one...

Which Sex offenders register are you refering too, that stupid data base on the internet, made by a person obssesed with paedo's..
I have not and am not likely to see any evidence of Dr Vincent Tabak being on any register, as I do not have access..

I do not know his trial number for that offence either... !

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4281 on: May 13, 2019, 04:57:55 PM »
The image amount changed for one...

Which Sex offenders register are you refering too, that stupid data base on the internet, made by a person obssesed with paedo's..
I have not and am not likely to see any evidence of Dr Vincent Tabak being on any register, as I do not have access..

I do not know his trial number for that offence either... !

You have read everything available about Tabak and its clear he is on the Register so why pretend you dont know this? You had a debate previously about when the registration will start

The online database is someone who is attempting to warn others what animals are out there who could abuse their children. Would not say he is obsessed...

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4282 on: May 13, 2019, 04:58:28 PM »
excuse me..you attacked me for making you feel guilty when I never asked a question about how you feel about the porn. Caroline is  back now but you have failed to reply to her? strange

Not strange... head mashed, decided to take itself off, for a little adventure, culminating, in remembering about a post, culminating in me remembering where the Imfamy, originated from in my tiny little mind..!

I do not have to answer everyones questions... I am not under interogation...

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4283 on: May 13, 2019, 05:00:03 PM »
Not strange... head mashed, decided to take itself off, for a little adventure, culminating, in remembering about a post, culminating in me remembering where the Imfamy, originated from in my tiny little mind..!

I do not have to answer everyones questions... I am not under interogation...


no but you are ok to accuse me of making you feel guilty when in fact it wasnt me asking. That was my point! selective understanding and reading skills when its suits

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4284 on: May 13, 2019, 05:00:53 PM »
You have read everything available about Tabak and its clear he is on the Register so why pretend you dont know this? You had a debate previously about when the registration will start

The online database is someone who is attempting to warn others what animals are out there who could abuse their children. Would not say he is obsessed...

If as you say i have read everything about Tabak.. Then all that means is what is out there at the time and on the internet is all there is... Which adds up to FA!

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4285 on: May 13, 2019, 05:11:48 PM »

no but you are ok to accuse me of making you feel guilty when in fact it wasn't me asking. That was my point! selective understanding and reading skills when its suits

But at what point am I referring to Jixy... A recent post by maybe you or Caroline,  or all the earlier posts when you joined in to give me grief about Andrew Ashman, whom I had never heard of until you and the people you were agreeing with at the time thought it would be a weeze to call me that...

Strange thing being... Why would anyone call me that...

I keep saying we are not in America, we don't have data bases the public can view, so I had no idea who Andrew Ashman was or cared who Andrew Ashman was, it wouldn't have been reported Nationally , and it wasn't in my local rag... And I have no need to check everyone in my town or neighbourhood that might be on an unofficial register...

I'm not a nonce stalker for FS...

So why should a random persons name affect me? And who's bright idea was it to call it me in the first place??

That is numpty behaviour by anyones standard...



jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4286 on: May 13, 2019, 05:16:26 PM »
But at what point am I referring to Jixy... A recent post by maybe you or Caroline,  or all the earlier posts when you joined in to give me grief about Andrew Ashman, whom I had never heard of until you and the people you were agreeing with at the time thought it would be a weeze to call me that...

Strange thing being... Why would anyone call me that...

I keep saying we are not in America, we don't have data bases the public can view, so I had no idea who Andrew Ashman was or cared who Andrew Ashman was, it wouldn't have been reported Nationally , and it wasn't in my local rag... And I have no need to check everyone in my town or neighbourhood that might be on an unofficial register...

I'm not a nonce stalker for FS...

So why should a random persons name affect me? And who's bright idea was it to call it me in the first place??

That is numpty behaviour by anyones standard...

 @)(++(*


you like to bring him into it dont you. double bluff and all that. You post like you do and our posts will be deleted. Again like the rest of your posts just because you say it doesnt mean its true

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4287 on: May 13, 2019, 05:19:49 PM »
Twas Paul of the red shade whom said :

Quote
As always when points of order , facts and truths are shown and proven time and time again you fail to come up with an answer why is that & lets not hide behind your fake name anymore Drew Ashman lets just say we all know you are fake , A Conman, have had more faces than a town hall clock as a Gasman, Film Maker, Researcher ,criminologist, Internet blogger, forum troll and a Numpty .....

jixy

  • Guest
Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4288 on: May 13, 2019, 05:22:14 PM »
Twas Paul of the red shade whom said :


Very numpty behaviour to quote you to post this... good deflection though, worth a try

I dont see anyone here saying they are called Paul. So twice today you have quoted me when it was someone else.

Thought you were good at research or is it the poor me card again? you should make a film

Offline [...]

Re: The Defence Will State Their Case
« Reply #4289 on: May 13, 2019, 05:23:50 PM »
Can I just say I signed into this forum tonight to reply to a comment made by Angelo. I haven't posted on this thread  for a while because its pretty much pointless.

Nine you straight away mentioned my likes on said post quickly followed by my choice of picture and slam straight into a mention of ' a man you don't know'

You brought Drew aka Mr Andrew Ashman to the table for whatever reason so please don't start pointing the finger at others. Its all part of the game!


Not True....

As always when points of order , facts and truths are shown and proven time and time again you fail to come up with an answer why is that & lets not hide behind your fake name anymore Drew Ashman lets just say we all know you are fake , A Conman, have had more faces than a town hall clock as a Gasman, Film Maker, Researcher ,criminologist, Internet blogger, forum troll and a Numpty .....


After a few little games that were had having try to guess what on earth you were on about...