I read somewhere that Jo's parents were in agreement with the making of the program, although they declined to take part, but not sure if Mr. Jefferies was involved at all.
Can only find interviews with Chris Jefferies concerning his wrongful arrest rather than his verdict on the drama-doc.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IFgGbNtF0wA
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AsZnfi5oM5o
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wS_zf_kZ6k
Is there room for yet another miscarriage of justice on here, as someone believes they got the wrong man in Vincent Tabak.
Read the comment by Philip Hollingbery...
http://www.independent.co.uk/arts-entertainment/tv/reviews/the-lost-honour-of-christopher-jefferies-part-2-tv-review-an-impressive-drama-but-joanna-yeates-story-still-wasnt-properly-told-9919435.html
and... http://vincent-tabak-is-innocent.blogspot.co.uk/2012/01/jury.html
I am now trying to work out what reason it appears that people have been opposed to what I have said..
Is the difference, everyone else whom has had anything to say has pointed the finger at someone else, where as i am not pointing the finger at anyone, not even knowing what is real or not about this whole reported case..
So it appears you either point the finger at CJ or GR and that has been the norm in forums etc for years... But I looked at that... The opportunities and possibilities are endless... The interpretation of the evidence is endless... People whom needed to be interviewed... endless!
Not following what should be protocol... bizarre...
I have gone backwards and forwards, and maybe I am wrong in my beliefs, but it makes no sense, it is nonsense, and as I have stated, I do not know if Dr Vincent Tabak exists... I do not understand why anyone from The Netherlands hasn't said anything...
I cannot point the finger at GR, I cannot point the finger at CJ...
But I think it is time GR said something about what he knows, and CJ, seeing as I will repeat for the umpteenth time, CJ conversed with Dr Vincent Tabak on 2 occasions that weekend of the 17th December 2010 to the 19th December 2010, this by his own admission on video, his Leveson statement too being a record of what CJ had stated....
But I cannot understand why he would be allowed to be a core participant in the Leveson when he could quite easily have been called as a witness, and apparently Leveson 2, was on hold waiting for other investigations and proceedings to be completed...
So why was CJ allowed to be a core participant?? It's beyond me...
But this whole case is beyond me.... Utter twoddle...
It has to be .... The parents walking around the second scene of crime on the 27th December 2010, when the crime scene hadn't finished being processed... A Flat frozen in time ,staged....
I'm not going to repeat it all, I have said enough on the oddities....
Can people really accept what happened in this case?, can people accept the outcome of this case?
Being in 2 minds about whether Dr Vincent Tabak is real or not, I always consider it is possible, that he is in prison....
So why isn't anyone saying anything about it??