I totally agree strangely enough. If anyone on the internet has committed a criminal offence with what they post then they should be dealt by the police. However simply suggesting the McCann's story is holier than a ripe Edam does not as yet thankfully constitute a criminal offence and supporters I'm afraid will just have to get over the fact.
Firstly, Edam cheese tends not to have holes.
Secondly, suggesting that the McCanns covered up the death of their daughter and hid her body, repeatedly making such a claim, creating website(s) to promote this theory, re-tweeting crude photoshop images in the name of "satire", circulating the McCanns home address and google images of their house etc, is pretty much exactly what many "sceptics" have done over the years and these activities differ very little from the activities of Spivey. What exactly is your view of Chris Spivey, him also being a McCann "sceptic" and all? Is he a troll? Are his activities acceptable in the name of "freedom of speach (sic)"? How about a straight answer from JF "sceptic" on this man's behaviour?