Goncalo Amaral.

[Miss Taken Identity]

Then you aren't reading my posts or g post properly
G hasn't provided any proper update.. That's the point I'm making. She seems to think she has... As do you

OKAY... Then please provide an update which you have. Thank you.

 Is there an update. I read G's post to say nothing has moved forward from day one.

[barrier]

that was posted on Saunonkonokos cite around a year ago

Go here and put the number in.

http://app.echr.coe.int/SOP/index.aspx?lg=en

[Mr Gray]

I clearly have information which you don't have. I check the progress of the application regularly.

you claim to have information I do not have...as you have just posted on another thread...

provide cites for anything they claim to be facts.

please provide  a cite...I really cant stand hypocrisy

[Mr Gray]

Go here and put the number in.

http://app.echr.coe.int/SOP/index.aspx?lg=en

  thanks, I take it you dont have the number of the mccann case.

[barrier]

  thanks, I take it you dont have the number of the mccann case.

Where do you think the screen shot came from,

[Mr Gray]

Where do you think the screen shot came from,

then you know and accept its not up to date.

[barrier]

then you know and accept its not up to date.

Of course its up to date,go to where I linked to put in the number and you get the state of play as is.

[Mr Gray]

Of course its up to date,go to where I linked to put in the number and you get the state of play as is.

so lets be clear...you have the number of the Mccanns application

[barrier]

so lets be clear...you have the number of the Mccanns application

Yes.

[Mr Gray]

Yes.

CITE.....then why did you post a screenshot from ayear ago

[barrier]

CITE.....then why did you post a screenshot from ayear ago

Its from today,you obviously don't have the number.

[Mr Gray]

Its from today,you obviously don't have the number.

i dont...and you havent shown you do either. That does not mean there is no discussion re the case between the parties at the moment
Nothing would show there unless a decision has been made....I m suggesting that due to amarals backtracking ...something may well be going on

[pathfinder73]

I don't think there is any question to the proven fact that Eddie did not alert to so called cadaver scent in the hire car. 
Amaral merely promoted that he did in his book and everywhere else he could spread the lie.

Even today the clip and still photo of Eddie alerting noisily ... not to cadaver ... but to cellular material from a living human being appears everywhere as a shibboleth of sceptic belief.

It is quite simply wrong.
Eddie's alert as confirmed by the CSI dog and forensic tests proved it was to cellular material on the key fob and came from Madeleine's father.

So there you have the truth of one lie ... and it emanates directly from Amaral as do so many, many more.

Keela alerted to blood in the boot. The key isn't kept in the boot!

In the sample collected in the boot area of the vehicle, 15 of the identified
DNA components coincide with the corresponding components in the DNA profile of
Madeleine McCann, this of [having] 19 components.

Portimao, 11 September 2007
Inspector
Joao Carlos

https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MADELEINES_DNA.htm

[G-Unit]

Yes.

Shall we share it Barrier?

[Mr Gray]

Shall we share it Barrier?

You dont convince me of anything...you have made a claim you cannot substantiate and by your own rules you should provide a cite. You should not expect others to do what you fail to do yourself.

The fact is amaral has made an extraordinary statement that backtracks what on he has previously said. It seems to suggests something is happening with the ECHR. No judgement obvioulsy...before a judgement there has to be discussions...evidence etc.