People moaning cos it isnt100% factual with every little detail lol.
It is not a documentary. It is a TV drama BASED on real events. In my opinion it is great TV for those who like true stories and detective series.
It must be difficult for the 'anoraks' of this case though. I watched a documentary a few years back which was factual and made my own mind up he is guilty. However, I agree with Angelo, although pre credits is does tell the viewers it is based on a true story - events and names have been changed. It could give the wrong message.
It is well acted apart from the appallingly bad Welsh accent. It would also be true that sheila who would have been on a sedative based anti psychotic drug would not have 'lashed' out in a frenzied attack.
Things to think about:
Sheila shot herself twice?- Massive clue!
No one was awakened by the frenzied attack on Nevile [Victim #1] therefore a silencer would have been used.
It was proved that Sheila could not have shot herself once never mind twice!
Bamber denied being 'involved' but then claimed he hired a 'hit man' . Professional killers just use one bullet to the heart or head. So he did have a motive after-all, by his own admission.
The phone call farce: did not dial 999 but was hesitant and called local force?
His Behavior.
Just a few things made up my mind.I have yet to read anything to persuade me to change my mind.