Quite a claim. You can't just casually throw something like that in there. Can you elaborate or provide a cite?
It's appeared in numerous places over the years that Kane owned a bomber jacket. Like everything else with this case, there's always a lack of proof, like Mitchell's "Parka" and proof he committed the murder. The number of lies and liars involved in this case when you analyse it all albeit tedious, is the biggest sign Mitchell did NOT do it. If MK did it or some other random crackpot there wouldn't be all these lies from so many different "witnesses". Why are they all lying? Consider these lies:
1. F and D don't remember anything in Court from the day of the murder or why the bike was at the V at 5.15pm. I mean seriously???
2. JaJ in Court claims not to know the Roan's Dyke Path...hmm she lives 300 yards from it for over 15 years and has never cycled up it, walked up it or even been warned by her mother NOT to go up there alone? Hmmm that's funny, because Jodi had been warned about that.
3. Alice Walker fails in Court to explain why she went straight to the path and why nobody was looking in the trees before they reached the start of the wall which leads to the V.
4. LK gives a statement saying he heard a noise like branches rustling, then in Court he changes it to... "strangling noises".
5. Jo J was in the house all afternoon on the day of the murder claims JuJ. No he wasn't, he was identified as the Stocky Man following Jodi.
6. Craig Dobbie lied in Court saying there was only a search warrant for Mitchell's house. That's recently proved to have been a lie.
Whether MK owned a bomber jacket or not, it's obvious he didn't do it otherwise why would all these people be lying? Would people normally all lie when they had no idea who the killer was? I don't think so somehow.
