Netflix - the Murat interview.

[G-Unit]

Can we really be sure to know what Kate is meaning by "That one person misidentified him is understandable but three, and all from the same group, is simply stretching incredulity"?   

Is she really turning against her friends or is she supporting them?

In my opinion she is saying that one person might be mistaken but not three. She seems to think that them all belonging to the same group adds credibility, but I would say that detracts from it. Three unconnected witnesses would be more credible imo. After all, nine people from the same group testified that the alarn was raised at 10pm and that raised suspicions. 

[Angelo222]

In my opinion she is saying that one person might be mistaken but not three. She seems to think that them all belonging to the same group adds credibility, but I would say that detracts from it. Three unconnected witnesses would be more credible imo. After all, nine people from the same group testified that the alarn was raised at 10pm and that raised suspicions.

Anyone who believes that the so-called Murat sighting wasn't discussed by the group at great length before reporting it to the PJ are kidding themselves.

And then we have the Kennedy entourage pretending to be doing Murat a favour and all they were attempting to do was set him up.  As I stated yesterday, they should have been arrested for conspiracy.

[faithlilly]

In my opinion she is saying that one person might be mistaken but not three. She seems to think that them all belonging to the same group adds credibility, but I would say that detracts from it. Three unconnected witnesses would be more credible imo. After all, nine people from the same group testified that the alarn was raised at 10pm and that raised suspicions.

Apologies I meant it takes credibility away.

[Robittybob1]

Apologies I meant it takes credibility away.

Well isn't that what Kate is saying about her friends too?

[pathfinder73]

In my opinion she is saying that one person might be mistaken but not three. She seems to think that them all belonging to the same group adds credibility, but I would say that detracts from it. Three unconnected witnesses would be more credible imo. After all, nine people from the same group testified that the alarn was raised at 10pm and that raised suspicions.

Damn right when most of them said they didn't check the time but still said it was 22:00. Gerry gave a time of 22:03 and Matt said 21:50 in the interview where he was accused of abducting Maddy - they were both wearing watches which makes it very interesting Which time is correct? A media report said Kate left at 21:51 to check so that leads to Matt's time.

[Venturi Swirl]

Damn right when most of them said they didn't check the time but still said it was 22:00. Gerry gave a time of 22:03 and Matt said 21:50 in the interview where he was accused of abducting Maddy - they were both wearing watches which makes it very interesting Which time is correct? A media report said Kate left at 21:51 to check so that leads to Matt's time.

Faithlilly is always banging on about Gerry saying the alarm was raised at 10.13, so does that not negate the your and G-Unit’s argument?

[pathfinder73]

I have the alarm time at 21:54. I have the Smithman sighting at 22:03.

[G-Unit]

Faithlilly is always banging on about Gerry saying the alarm was raised at 10.13, so does that not negate the your and G-Unit’s argument?

I was referring to the agreed timeline, which was not adhered to by all the individuals. Gerry McCann;

4th May about 22:00
10th May;  without anything to signal, it being 22h03, he turned to alert KATE that it was time for her to go to see the children.........About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness

No one else noticed Kate's latemess, not even Fiona who was sitting beside her. Matthew said;

10th May;  she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50.

[pathfinder73]

McCann documentary time. I shouldn't laugh but 

[Venturi Swirl]

I was referring to the agreed timeline, which was not adhered to by all the individuals. Gerry McCann;

4th May about 22:00
10th May;  without anything to signal, it being 22h03, he turned to alert KATE that it was time for her to go to see the children.........About 10 minutes later, he started to worry about her lateness

No one else noticed Kate's latemess, not even Fiona who was sitting beside her. Matthew said;

10th May;  she had gone there alone to do that at 21:50.

I don’t understand the point you are trying to make I’m afraid.

[G-Unit]

I don’t understand the point you are trying to make I’m afraid.

Why would they all agree that the alarn was raised at 10pm then change it in their individual interviews? That suggests that that they didn't really agree.

[Venturi Swirl]

Why would they all agree that the alarn was raised at 10pm then change it in their individual interviews? That suggests that that they didn't really agree.

Which also suggests there was no collusion. 

[Eleanor]

Which also suggests there was no collusion.

Absolutely.  Otherwise they would have agreed.

[G-Unit]

Which also suggests there was no collusion.

The interesting question is why nine people allowed a timeline to be produced and given to the police when they privately disagreed with what it said? 

[Eleanor]

The interesting question is why nine people allowed a timeline to be produced and given to the police when they privately disagreed with what it said?

They probably didn't have time to consider it all in minor detail.  You are suggesting that they did this on purpose.  Not on, in my opinion.