Hmm...so the motivation would be they were all sedating their kids with some sedative that would have to be illegal to give to children ie: not Calpol or Piriton as there could be perfectly good reasons for giving their kids that. Do you think their regular checks were then predicated on the need to check their kids hadn't died because of the meds that had been administered or do you think that the regular checks never happened, despite reports from the Tapas staff to the contrary? Any thoughts as to what this sedative might have been?
PS: I'm enjoying this complete and utter breakdown in the libel rules on this forum, isn't it fun?!
The tapas staff did not bare witness to any parents checking the children- they only gave statements that some were leaving the table.
The checks were not regular as you suggest, the reason we know this is; they had to get together to create a timeline in a hurry for the police!. Yes, child stolen by sleazy paedos and here they are writing up a timeline... torn pages from their missing daughter book.OMG how heartless.
It was just sheer luck that the evening Maddie disappeared she had two physical checks. 1 from loving doting father who saw her clearly as the door was open, but the mother couldn't see anything it was too dark even though the moving door was at the same openenss as Gerry left it...
I still think about their statements in disbelief. Dad saw her where he left her on top of the covers as it was a warm night- Mun left her snuggled under the covers because it was cold...
Gerry saw his daughter clearly, Kate claims it was too dark...
Reminds me of that story goldielocks...
