The Opinion of a ‘PROPER’ Criminologist.

[TruthSeeker2003]

I also don’t view David Wilson to be a ‘proper’ criminologist

What is a proper Criminologist in your opinion? He is qualified and teaches the subject. What more does he require in YOUR opinion?

[Nicholas]

Yes, very. The amateur dramatics and grinning were off the scale and I could only watch a few minutes. Still, LM supporters claim the tide is turning and "they" are running scared.

I only heard the am-dram and also only listened to a few minutes

She sounds extra desperate

[KenMair]

Oh Nicholas , Luke could be proven innocent and you would still say guilty. 

Maybe because he IS guilty. After almost 20 years the best LM's defenders can say, after blaming various innocent others, is the brother lured her into the woods, killed her and carried her to the V break then escaped soaked in blood on the back of a clapped out moped without being seen? I often think if LM was spotted on CCTV with a bloodied knife his supporters would blame the Daily Record.

[Nicholas]

What is a proper Criminologist in your opinion? He is qualified and teaches the subject. What more does he require in YOUR opinion?

This is worth a listen
👇

INNOCENCE FRAUD With ROBERTA GLASS (Part 1)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/14/innocence-fraud-with-roberta-glass-part-1/

Part 2 ~ Dropping soon..

[Gummybear]

David Wilson did a TV show whereby he/and the producers/editors attempted to pretend convicted killer Bert Spencer was responsible for the so called ‘Bridgewater fours’ murder of Carl Bridgewater 

Michael Hickey (who confessed to Carl Bridgewater’s murder) should never have been released from prison!

And how he only got a suspended prison sentence with a murder conviction already under his belt - was a joke

http://Http://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/carl-bridgewater-michael-hickey-robbery-15350011
Is your name Stephanie Hall ????  oops

[TruthSeeker2003]

This is worth a listen
👇
Part 2 ~ Dropping soon..

But what is YOUR answer? 

[Bullseye]

What’s your interpretation of a criminologist ?

In short someone who studied criminals and crime. Or someone like Sandra and Professor David Wilson. You didn’t answer what qualifications and experience in your view would Prof Wilson need to become a ‘proper’ criminologist. I think his professional background speaks for itself.

[Venturi Swirl]

In short someone who studied criminals and crime. Or someone like Sandra and Professor David Wilson. You didn’t answer what qualifications and experience in your view would Prof Wilson need to become a ‘proper’ criminologist. I think his professional background speaks for itself.

Did no one who investigated the case and who brought LM to justice have any professional qualifications or experience of criminology then?

[Nicholas]

What is a proper Criminologist in your opinion? He is qualified and teaches the subject. What more does he require in YOUR opinion?

proper
/ˈprɒpə/
denoting something that is truly what it is said or regarded to be; genuine.



I don’t get a ‘genuine’ vibe off of David Wilson

Dropping soon
👇

Could David Wilson ‘Suffer’ From Hybristophilia? (Part 176)
👇
http://theerrorsthatplaguethemiscarriageofjusticemovement.home.blog/2023/04/13/killer-luke-mitchell-could-david-wilson-suffer-from-hybristophilia-part-176/

[barrier]

If any one has a few hours to waste CH4 "In the footsteps of killers", Wilson along with Emelia Fox look at old cases,
gives an insight imo into the workings of Wilson, its hard work so stock up on snacks.

[Bullseye]

Did no one who investigated the case and who brought LM to justice have any professional qualifications or experience of criminology then?

I did not say they didn’t. I have no idea what qualifications those who investigate the case had or if a criminologist was involved or not. I was asked what the definition of a criminologist was in my mind.

[Bullseye]

proper
/ˈprɒpə/
denoting something that is truly what it is said or regarded to be; genuine.



I don’t get a ‘genuine’ vibe off of David Wilson

Dropping soon
👇

Fair enough I get what you mean, I personally think he seems very qualified and I respect alot of the work he has done and that’s why I wrote to him in 2019. It was not to ask him to look into the case or anything like that it was just to ask if he had heard of the case and what his opinion on Luke was, if he thought Luke was guilty or not as I respect his opinion. So I’m glad he had a chance to take a look into it a bit and write an article on it.

[faithlilly]

I did not say they didn’t. I have no idea what qualifications those who investigate the case had or if a criminologist was involved or not. I was asked what the definition of a criminologist was in my mind.

Well we certainly know that the FBI Criminal Behavioural Unit looked at whether Luke could be the killer at the behest of the investigating police force. You really don’t get much more knowledgeable in aspects of criminal behaviour than them. Lothian and Borders police buried the report because it was favourable to Luke so it appears that they were going to plough ahead with their blinkered investigation no matter what professional advice they got.

[faithlilly]

Maybe because he IS guilty. After almost 20 years the best LM's defenders can say, after blaming various innocent others, is the brother lured her into the woods, killed her and carried her to the V break then escaped soaked in blood on the back of a clapped out moped without being seen? I often think if LM was spotted on CCTV with a bloodied knife his supporters would blame the Daily Record.

Do you think those who believe that Luke is innocent of Jodi’s murder are obliged to put forward another suspect to make their opinion valid? Shouldn’t the lack of evidence be more important?

[Venturi Swirl]

If any one has a few hours to waste CH4 "In the footsteps of killers", Wilson along with Emelia Fox look at old cases,
gives an insight imo into the workings of Wilson, its hard work so stock up on snacks.

That is a truly dreadful, phony programme.