You're right of course hun I didn't really mean 'fascinated' just like you didn't really mean 30 decades!
I was trying to find a word that meant on tenter hooks but without suggesting they are too worried ..... I would be surprised if Anne and David etc. aren't fully expecting just another Bamber rejection! Although there is finality to this one in my opinion!
After all the abuse they have suffered by certain s..mbags at Tesko Towers isn't it nice to know that those who abused them as you describe have wasted so much time ... months, years and decades in Tesco's case ... fighting a hopeless cause trying to free their pet child killer!
Come on CCRC put them into their misery!
Oh god, 30 decades!!! whooopsy, just an ickle typo
I do hope for the
right decision, whatever that is. Obviously I hope there is no referral based on my opinion that the conviction is safe, with the obvious caveat that my opinion is based on the knowledge I have of the case. I stand to be corrected, just in case the submission contains stuff that we don't know about that really does render the conviction unsafe, but I think this is unlikely given what the defence has said about the basis of appeal so far. The trouble is, we don't know. If there is a referral with a series of grounds, I believe that the court of appeal can only go so far in considering whether this, that or the next thing would have changed the decision of jurors. However, the option of a retrial is going to be impossible after all this time. These kind of issues are what make this case so interesting (for intelligent people anyway rather than loons at TT!!) - although I wish this wasn't at the expense of the the family.
Even if JB is kicked into the long grass this week, he has nothing to lose and will go on, with no shortage of willing volunteers