Did Gonçalo Amaral misinterpret the evidence?

[John]

Second one child died the following day

We have seen and discussed all these. Before


I shall continue to pontificate from a position of knowledge
http://yourhealth.asiaone.com/content/baby-dies-after-fall
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3284447/Five-month-old-baby-girl-died-brain-bleed-week-mother-dropped-slipped-tiled-floor-Santa-s-grotto.html

You stated that a child cannot die from a fall onto a floor, that is untrue.  I won't warn you again about this.

[Mr Gray]

You stated that a child cannot die from a fall onto a floor, that is untrue.  I won't warn you again about this.

I stated that a child could not die from a fall from a sofa
Any fall would take 24 hrs for death
The first case you quoted the cause of death was not established
We have been through all this before
Amarals theory does not hold water

[Mr Gray]

Stop pontificating davel, such a fall could be fatal.

A simple bump on the head can kill you.

http://scienceblogs.com/whitecoatunderground/2009/03/18/a-simple-bump-on-the-head-can/


Examples of deaths following fall onto a tiled floor.

http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/toddler-died-sleep-after-slipping-6982555k
http://yourhealth.asiaone.com/content/baby-dies-after-fall
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3284447/Five-month-old-baby-girl-died-brain-bleed-week-mother-dropped-slipped-tiled-floor-Santa-s-grotto.html

The third case death was weeks later
At the end of the article the consultant questions the facts in the case

[Brietta]

We should also be careful when making libellous post making assumptions of reasons why GA was removed from the case

Might I recommend to you Chapter 21 of his book where Mr Amaral makes numerous assumptions of his own as to the reasons behind his dismissal ~ some of them quite extraordinary.

[Mr Gray]

You stated that a child cannot die from a fall onto a floor, that is untrue.  I won't warn you again about this.

What I have said is a child cannot die from a fall from a sofa
Death would take approx 24 hrs
This means Amarals theory does not hold water

[John]

I stated that a child could not die from a fall from a sofa
Any fall would take 24 hrs for death
The first case you quoted the cause of death was not established
We have been through all this before
Amarals theory does not hold water

Maybe you should have introduced the word 'instantly' into your assertion.

[John]

What I have said is a child cannot die from a fall from a sofa
Death would take approx 24 hrs
This means Amarals theory does not hold water

Death could occur within hours as has been seen from many actual cases. Amaral's theory was entirely possible.

[ferryman]

Death could occur within hours as has been seen from many actual cases. Amaral's theory was entirely possible.

Amaral's unfounded guesswork was a disgrace.

[Mr Gray]

Death could occur within hours as has been seen from many actual cases.

So the injury could not have happened between 8.30 and 10
There is just not enough time for the intracranial pressure to build up to cause blockage of the Foramen Magnum
Which is. What causes death in thes cases

[stephen25000]

So the injury could not have happened between 8.30 and 10
There is just not enough time for the intracranial pressure to build up to cause blockage of the Foramen Magnum
Which is. What causes death in thes cases

This has been gone through many times before and you are still not listening.

Metaphorically of course.

[stephen25000]

Amaral's unfounded guesswork was a disgrace.

It wasn't just Amaral ferryman..

Try not to imply it was.

[Mr Gray]

This has been gone through many times before and you are still not listening.

Metaphorically of course.

Death from a subdural haematoma could not have occurred from an injury between 8.30and10.30
Fact
Amarals thesis does not hold water

[Mr Gray]

It wasn't just Amaral ferryman..

Try not to imply it was.

That's right
They all got it wrong

[Mr Gray]

So if Maddie didn't die in an accident
What happened to her

[stephen25000]

Death from a subdural haematoma could not have occurred from an injury between 8.30and10.30
Fact
Amarals thesis does not hold water

It has been explained to your before, Madeleine could have easily sustained an injury prior to May the 3rd, or earlier that day.

It was me months ago who first mentioned the possibility of a subdural haematoma.

Do you not remember that ?

You were also keen to dismiss that then.

The basic treatise of accidental death remains on the table.

It has already been acknowledged Amaral did not get everything right.