An old style amusement park, one with a freakshow. Don't get me wrong there have been some good members on the site and there still are, and I mean on both sides. But it's ruined by those who don't know ANYTHING about the case. I truly don't understand the ones who don't know anything about the case that post 24/7 for months. Lookout knows nothing, Jackie has never known anything about the Bamber case, Maggie is absolutely clueless and always has been - read her posts and try and find one that's got any clue about the Bamber case - next time she gets me unfairly banned for any reason or posts how much of a FAIR moderator she is I will post the hundreds of her emails I have between her and Jackie where Maggie shows her true colours with her words about myself, Bridget, Holly, Adam, Jane - just digusting behaviour.
Does anyone have a link to the topic where the SJ 'statement' was actually posted?
It is surprising that supporters that are so passionate have no sources. Thought sources would be posted non stop.
The exception is Mike who has sources but then comes up with crazy theories.
Lookout has never supplied a source. If one is requested she says 'find it yourself'.
Nugs has only provided one source, on Barry George. This was to support his vision that The Sun turned down Bamber's offer of a free life story.
I did ask a moderator for a source once. That really upset her. The source was supplied the following day. The next two days was spent complaining that I had asked for a source. Thought moderators would have lots of information.
David provides snippets of documents. Together with his own diagrams. He gets very upset if guilters provide sources.
Roch, Bill, JackieD, David & Mike all have new information they won't supply.