You criticise Mrs M who was just trying to help yet you make no mention of the UK private detective type peeps who commenced private investigations and witness interviews in Luz in May 2007
Are you sure of this?
I am not challenging. I have been thinking about the 'biggest PJ mistake thread' and a couple of interesting role-play viewpoints come to mind.
What would I have done if I headed the PJ investigation, at the end of Fri 4 May? The T9 statements were in and were confusing, to put it mildly. Two teams of forensics were saying no break-in. Three was a media maelstrom. It was emerging, I believe, in the UK press that the shutters had been jemmied, when quite clearly they had not. The vast bulk of OC guests would fly out tomorrow. If I were SIO, what would I have made of it all, and what should my priorities have been?
Then we have the McCann viewpoint, which must have been equally bewildering. No forensic reports. What appears to be broad consensus in the T9 about how the holiday in general went, and how Thu 3 May went. Kate saying the shutter and window were open, while the two gates and patio door were not. Evidence, Gerry, that the shutter could be opened from outside. Dianne trying the same and failing. A media maelstrom. Stories emerging from the UK that might or might not have an origin in Portugal. Why jemmied shutter if you can push it up without a jemmy? And the vast bulk of OC guests will fly out tomorrow.
Were there really witness interviews conducted by private individuals in Luz in May 2007?