Author Topic: The Smithman e-fits  (Read 12040 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Vertigo Swirl

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1260 on: April 11, 2018, 05:21:31 PM »
No one really knows anything much about this e-fit business do they?  Still it's fun guessing.
"Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" - MLK Jr

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1261 on: April 11, 2018, 05:59:21 PM »
When is an e-fit not an e-fit?
"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there"..... "The Go Between" by L.P.Hartley

Offline Robittybob1

  • Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11363
  • Total likes: 1599
  • Wisdom and understanding please.
    • Help to solve the Madeleine McCann case
Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1262 on: April 11, 2018, 07:20:56 PM »
When is an e-fit not an e-fit?
When it is not fitting to call it an e-fit?

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1263 on: April 13, 2018, 11:13:03 AM »
No one really knows anything much about this e-fit business do they?  Still it's fun guessing.

Yes, I Certainly laughed out loud with the many descriptions  from efits from Jane Tanner of a non abductor...
« Last Edit: April 13, 2018, 05:31:18 PM by Miss Taken Identity »
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1264 on: April 13, 2018, 02:05:43 PM »
When is an e-fit not an e-fit?

When the witness has made an identification from other photographic evidence.

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1265 on: April 13, 2018, 02:06:56 PM »
Yes, I Certainly laughed out loud with he many descriptions  fro efits from Jane Tanner of a non abductor...

Jane Tanner's sighting was validated by the Met.

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1266 on: April 13, 2018, 02:53:56 PM »
Jane Tanner's sighting was validated by the Met.


validated? you mean they accept she saw someone. Yes.... NOT an abductor. ^*&&
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1267 on: April 13, 2018, 03:09:39 PM »
When the witness has made an identification from other photographic evidence.

How about when the witness has not seen the face?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1149925/Essex-Police-explain-create-e-fit-images-suspects.html
"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there"..... "The Go Between" by L.P.Hartley

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1268 on: April 13, 2018, 03:58:24 PM »
How about when the witness has not seen the face?
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/video/news/video-1149925/Essex-Police-explain-create-e-fit-images-suspects.html

Several of the Smith family allegedly saw his face, so I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

Certainly, if identified from the efits, the "chief suspect" has not suffered the Cheshire Cat treatment.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5603419/Cheshire-Cat-burglar-lookalike-forced-deny-friends-point-resemblance.html

Offline Miss Taken Identity

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1269 on: April 13, 2018, 05:32:43 PM »
Several of the Smith family allegedly saw his face, so I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

Certainly, if identified from the efits, the "chief suspect" has not suffered the Cheshire Cat treatment.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5603419/Cheshire-Cat-burglar-lookalike-forced-deny-friends-point-resemblance.html


Jane Tanner NEVER saw her  boogy mans face.. we moved on from Smith...
'Never underestimate the power of stupid people'... George Carlin

Offline misty

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1270 on: April 13, 2018, 06:15:56 PM »

Jane Tanner NEVER saw her  boogy mans face.. we moved on from Smith...

I must have missed the Tannerman efit.

Offline Alice Purjorick

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1271 on: April 13, 2018, 11:11:04 PM »
Several of the Smith family allegedly saw his face, so I'm not sure what point you are trying to make.

Certainly, if identified from the efits, the "chief suspect" has not suffered the Cheshire Cat treatment.
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5603419/Cheshire-Cat-burglar-lookalike-forced-deny-friends-point-resemblance.html

Only the obvious one.
If said witneess did not properly clock the moosh, or kite, of said ne'er do well an e-fit in accordance with the definition of e-fit cannot be made. The less moosh, or kite, seen the less accurate the e-fit as Essex copper says. QED.
"The past is a foreign country; they do things differently there"..... "The Go Between" by L.P.Hartley

Offline barrier

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1272 on: April 21, 2018, 10:49:47 AM »
I see over on cmomm T Bennett has received from the MET clarification on when they received the e-fits,October 2011.

Mark Rowley:There are odd headlines and odd stories in newspapers on a regular basis and most of those are nonsense.

Offline G-Unit

Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1273 on: April 21, 2018, 11:18:47 AM »
I see over on cmomm T Bennett has received from the MET clarification on when they received the e-fits,October 2011.

From the private investigators, not the McCanns or the Fund directors. I believe his next questions include asking which P.I.'s.
Accept nothing
Believe no-one
Confirm everything

Offline Robittybob1

  • Moderator
  • Executive Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 11363
  • Total likes: 1599
  • Wisdom and understanding please.
    • Help to solve the Madeleine McCann case
Re: The Smithman e-fits
« Reply #1274 on: April 21, 2018, 11:57:32 AM »
Something seems wrong with that story.
What are you doing to find Madeleine?
https://www.youcaring.com/madeleinemccann-1080869