That's great. At last. Bamber's supporters on the Blue forum are very determined but Mike, Lookout & Nugs never address the incriminating evidence, while David gets frustrated as he realises he made a wrong move in changing stance.
You're answers if all correct would make Bamber the unluckiest man ever & show an unprecedented successful industrial frame. Both of which supporters never agree with. Unfortunately the answers are not correct.
JB's case needs putting into context in that it's the only peacetime mass shooting unwitnessed by others. I see it as more a case of incompetence and negligence rather than "industrial frame" but for sure if he's innocent evidence was fabricated with EP and the lab involved.
All of 66 points have had at least one individual thread created by me, so I won't address each answer. Generally you're answers come under the following headings -
Why would it be otherwise ?
This is unacceptable & you're opinion. The COA & other sources would not mention these if it didn't deeply imcriminate Bamber.
The sources are weak at best based on 21st century forensic science. 3 appeal court judges, general scientists from FSS and UK based lawyers for defence and prosecution do not have the expertise in mass shootings. Parliament has already acknowledged high profile quality failings at FSS during 1980's.
What more can I say other than agree SC's person and nightdress are consistent with her as perp.
No kitchen fight
The crime scene and Nevill's injuries show there was a huge fight. But all supporters must refute this as Sheila & her nightdress were unmarked.
I disagree that the soc shows a "huge fight". Anyone sustaining 2 gsw's at close range to the face which were enough to kill had others not supervened was in no fit state to put up a defense. It seems NB was stumbling around in pain and shock and knocking into things. Remember also he had lost the use of his left arm.
Doesn't prove anything
However deeply incriminating. If there was one 'curious co incidence' maybe. But there are dozens.
No one would convict on these 'curious coincidences'. You could take any case and find 'curious coincidences. JB was convicted on silencer and blood not 'curious coincidences'.
The released evidence is wrong
All of my points had at least one source. Maybe one or two will have alternative sources. Such as Sutherst's 2010 toe nail theory. But not 66.
I don't see a source as being sound forensic evidence.
Conflicting theories
You say Nevill & Sheila had been up bare footed in nightwear. Obviously making a lot of noise. Then say why would the twins & June wake.
You say Sheila's face, body & nightdress being spotless is expected. I assume you don't agree with Sutherst's toe nail polish theory.
As I said I think NB and SC were downstairs. NB called JB and SC went upstairs to shoot June. At this point there's no reason to believe there was any particular noise upstairs in what you term a "big house". Once upstairs SC released a volley of shots into June. NB arrived on the landing and sustained the 2 x gsw's to his face taking out his voice box rendering him speechless. He retreated downstairs with SC following. He stumbled into table and stools and fell precariously on the chair where SC wielded blows with the rifle and shot NB a further 4 x's. Any noise heard by the twins was likely to come from June but she may have kept quiet in an attempt to keep them safe.
I don't know much about Peter Surherst's nail theory but it sounds a bit flakey!
Point 60 relates to the 5 crime scene threads of the 5 individuals which were posted on Blue. They all showed Bamber was the killer.
I don't believe there's any evidence which shows JB as perp other than the silencer/blood taken at face value.
Point 11 refers to Sheila's time limits between 3.10am/3.36am - 3.48am. She would only have time to do about 20% of what people claim she did prior to the police arriving.
Well I don't believe she did what has been claimed eg ritual wash/shower, read bible, wrote suicide notes etc.
