Is the Bamber conviction legally safe?

[Holly Goodhead]

I have tried to upload attachments but oddly I get a message that it has to be approved by a moderator.

Not something I'm aware of.  Try doing it now while I'm on the forum.

[david1819]

Not something I'm aware of.  Try doing it now while I'm on the forum.

Same thing

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

[LuminousWanderer]

I have tried to upload attachments but oddly I get a message that it has to be approved by a moderator.

Never mind.  Anyway, I think my questions have been more or less answered within the framework of the anti-Bamber bias of this Forum.  That being the case, that's me done here, more or less.

Thanks anyway.

[Nicholas]

Never mind.  Anyway, I think my questions have been more or less answered within the framework of the anti-Bamber bias of this Forum.  That being the case, that's me done here, more or less.

Thanks anyway.

So there you have it LM - smoke and mirrors

"There is but its no longer admissible."

Bamber supporters are claiming evidence exists to prove innocence but it's already been put before the courts and the courts have rejected it 

And David over on blue appears to have referred to a book written by Michael Naughton about the CCRC entitled "hope for the innocent. And "Malone" from chapter 8 appears to be Campbell Malone.

Both of whom were involved in the Simon Hall case referral back to the COA in 2009. I recall the disputes and frustrations over the higham burglary and knife evidence well. 

Btw anyone know what "fresh, fresh, fresh evidence" means?

[Angelo222]

Never mind.  Anyway, I think my questions have been more or less answered within the framework of the anti-Bamber bias of this Forum.  That being the case, that's me done here, more or less.

Thanks anyway.

If you mean anti mass murderer then you're welcome.   

[Nicholas]

https://jeremybamber.blogspot.co.uk/

"Police have accused a multiple murderer of "circumnavigating the formal process" of appeal by using the media and websites to fight his conviction.
Insp Cornish said Bamber was "well aware of the legal processes that he should follow to seek a review of his convictions".
"His attempt at circumnavigating the formal process using the media and websites is ill-conceived," the letter continued.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-essex-35932802

[Nicholas]

Did you mean 'there won't be fresh evidence?

It's that time of year again http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=6903.msg312490#msg312490

Anyone else get a sense of desperation coming from Bamber's camp..

Remember this last August?

"The group of supporters contend Bamber’s sister Sheila, who suffered from schizophrenia, carried out the murders before turning the gun on herself.
They claim there is evidence she was still alive and inside the house when officers surrounded the building.
The campaigners say a recently uncovered document reveals a 999 call was made from inside the farmhouse at 6.09am, while Bamber was outside with police officers.
A spokesman said: “It is our contention that the mentally ill Sheila, in a psychotic state, was alive inside the house after killing the family and she made the call out. The police didn’t raid until 7.38am.
“There’s other evidence to support this including lights going on and off and police firearms officers recording the curtains opening and closing while they surrounded the house and observed it.
http://Http://www.gazette-news.co.uk/news/15458597.Campaigners_uncover__direct_evidence__of_convicted_murderer_s_innocence/

[Holly Goodhead]

Same thing

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

I will look into this and get back to you.  I tried a while back to upload some files containing trial testimony without success.  I didn't receive any message though and just assumed the files were too big. 

[Holly Goodhead]

Same thing

Note: this post will not display until it's been approved by a moderator.

Have sent you a pm.