I'm no fan of JB's either!
The poster I mentioned the other day on the Injustice Anywhere forum who provided support on the Knox/Sollecito case said it would be a good idea to have all material released and have many eyes pore over it or words to this effect. He obviously has a proven track record working these cases so I took on board his comments.
That person either incorrectly assumes he is innocent and that there might be something in the evidence to prove that or simply wants the information like we do and wishes they would publish it.
Publishing all the evidence in this case including the COLP Report, all the COLP interview documents not released so far and the parts of the Dickinson report that even Mike doesn't dare publish will simply refute a lot of the BS made by Jeremy supporters and make it even more obvious he is guilty. If they publish things Jeremy received that his supporters want to pretend the police are concealing that will prove them liars and take away their whole fictional BS about there being evidence of innocence that police are hiding.
If being paid to represent Jeremy I would not advise Jeremy to go through the expense and effort of publishing everything it would not help him at all. Legal minds already combed through the evidence came up with the best BS arguments they could try to make on the basis of such and those efforts still failed miserably. The notion the public will find something is nonsense. The public didn't find anything in the Knox case the lawyers did and even pointed out the problems in the trial. The judges ignored common sense and facts to irrationally declare them guilty. The initial acquittal made that clear and this angered a panel of appellate judges who demanded she be convicted and sent it for a retrial because they wanted the pretense that the prosecution and trial was not a total sham. Those judges were humiliated when a more senior body of judges effectively ruled they were wrong as well as the initial trial court and acquitted Sollecitto and Knox outright. The same arguments made to the Court of Cassation were made at trial it is just that the Court of Cassation faced such evidence instead of ignoring it and making up nonsense.
US going through all the documents will not help Jeremy at all we want to go through them for our own benefit not his and it would be for our own benefit it would not help him at all. The notion something is hiding in the documents that lawyers missed which proves him innocent is not at all credible. The notion police would create let alone keep documents which prove evidence was planted and that Jeremy is innocent is as ludicrous as Mike's most outrageous claims. It's a pipedream that there is something in the mountain of documents Jeremy has that could prove he is innocent. The documents will just make even more clear why the government thinks Jeremy is guilty that offers no benefit to him.
Nor does the CCRC's rejection help him so he won't release it in full even though I wish the UK were like the US and such were a public record which the government had to make available to all not just the appellant.
I can't fault Jeremy for not releasing everything. His detractors will simply use it to prove his campaign team to be a bunch of liars and sift through it to find even more evidence to point to regarding his guilt. His supporters already looked through and cherry picked what they could fathom using to help him and only released those claims as opposed to everything which can be used to hurt him instead.
A website for killer Dennis Dechaine posted the transcripts from the trial as well as most of the briefs and other filings. Instead of having to pay to have access to everything it was posted. If one reads through everything it hurts Dechaine instead of helping him because you see how many lies he told and all the evidence that is against him and how it is impossible someone else committed the murders and framed him. His supporters believe delusional things to try to pretend he was framed by the real killer. Posting all the evidence proves they are delusional and that he is guilty. I don't think Jeremy posting everything would benefit him anymore than such aided Dechaine. Reading the testimony it is clear Dechaine came off very bad on the witness stand and lied both on the stand as well as to police when they first encountered him. He made up a ridiculous story about buying drugs in a bathroom among other things.
But even worse his own testimony ruled out the nonsense his supporters were spewing. To make things short he kidnapped a girl, left a receipt with his name behind int he driveway of the house he kidnapped her from, tied and gagged her using his rope and bandana, raped and killed her by strangling her with his scarf several hundred feet from his truck, buried her in a shallow grave in deep brush then walked the wrong way and got lost in the woods. Some people tried to help him find his truck but left him with police. He knew police would find the body near his truck so lied saying he left his keys in the truck and hid his keys in the police car so that if they found the body then he could say someone else stole his truck and used it.
His supporters maintain someone else stole his truck to kidnap her, dumped the receipt int he driveway to frame him and used the items from the truck to kill her and left her body near the truck in further efforts to frame him. She was kidnapped around 1PM and a witness saw Dechaine's truck leaving the scene. The receipt was found in the driveway at 3PM. So this means the killer would have to have stolen his truck very early in order to be able to plant the evidence, use it to kinap her, use his belongings from the truck to bind/kill her and then bury her body near it. Yet his own trial testimony was that he parked it for the last time around 6PM and then could not locate it again after this time.
It's not possible for someone to steal his truck after 6pm and go back in time and plant the receipt so it could be found at 3PM. So his own website blows the nonsense claims of his supporters right out of the water. In the meantime you learn about how he initially told police he had been no where near the road where the girl was kidnapped from but soon after described the house the girl was kidnapped from to police (thus proving he had been there because how else could he describe it) and claimed he pulled into the driveway to turn around and take a leak nearby and this must be how his receipt fell out in the driveway. The more you read the worse it gets.
If Jeremy's interrogations had not been published we would not have known about several lies he told or several changes in his accounts to police. These din't help him they hurt him. Ignorance is a best friend to propagandists.
His Campaign Team relies on ignorance and it would be sheer folly to release all the documents.
