I can't speak for David but I am not a supporter of the 'official' campaign and would not want to be associated with it in any shape or form. No more than I would want to be associated with Mike's mad incoherent foul-mouthed tirades. I think the CT and Mike are completely wrong in their claims about the case and totally misguided in the way they go about supporting JB.
I think David and I pretty much sing from the same hymn sheet on the case and have our own ways of supporting JB on and off the forum. Lone wolves 
I don't need to part of a CT no more than the likes of Charlotte Kiszko were in fighting an injustice on behalf of her son.
David advances many of Mike's claims and interacts with other supporters I don't see him as a lone wolf. Indeed he personally interacts with other supporters to advance his agenda.
An example of an argument of Mike's that David advances is the allegation that exhibit numbers SBJ/1, DB/1 and DRB/1 each pertained to a different moderator and eventually police decided to conceal that 3 moderators were collected and made up the narrative that one moderator was collected and that its exhibit number changed. This argument is made by the campaign team as well as Mike and was adopted by David. It was not made by Jeremy's lawyers ever though and I never saw you make it either.
Jeremy's lawyers recognized that the notion anyone doctored multiple moderators and police ultimately settled on one is silly. It is also silly to assert they could have retained the designation DB/1 for the moderator as well as for an exhibit from David Bird. Upon learning that they gave multiple exhibits the same designation they would have to change Bird's exhibits or Boutflour's exhibits. They could not use the same designations for both. So at minimum one must face that a change had to occur from DB/1 to something else.
Aside from the claims being silly the evidence is quite clear. Objective evidence illustrates how it did change. Until the change occurred every document referring to the moderator referred to it as SBJ/1. There are no documents created the same time that contain both exhibits.
It was not the only item that changed. Three other exhibits also changed to the DB prefix at the same time for the same reason (The telescopic site, .22LR ammunition and shotgun ammo). All 4 changed to the DRB prefix the same time also after it was discovered that David Bird already had logged 100 plus exhibits under that prefix.
There is thus zero support for making the allegation and yet the CT, Mike and David all do so.
Lone Wolf is not fitting for him in my opinion.
