J B Campaign Ltd - Much Ado About Nothing...

[puglove]

Message for Clappedout.....

PLEASE stop killing the blue forum. I've been out on the lash with my new mate Lady Di Watersquirter, (what a raver!!) and I want something to read and laugh at.

Selfish.   

[puglove]

Message for Clappedout.....

PLEASE stop killing the blue forum. I've been out on the lash with my new mate Lady Di Watersquirter, (what a raver!!) and I want something to read and laugh at.

Selfish.   

And a few helpful notes for you, Clappy know-nowt.

You are completely wrong about the telephone thing. i might not be as old as you (I'm not bloody Methusula) but I remember how it was in the 80's.

In the 80's, there was no way to find "glove prints." Not everyone wore mittens made out of Big-Foot wool.

Nobody cares that you popped next door and annoyed the medics trying to save your neighbour. I had a neighbour like you once, and I used to lob slugs over the fence. And pretended to be out when they knocked on to beg for milk and teabags.

Keep on doing what you do, Clappy. You're helping Bamber so much!!

[puglove]

And a few helpful notes for you, Clappy know-nowt.

You are completely wrong about the telephone thing. i might not be as old as you (I'm not bloody Methusula) but I remember how it was in the 80's.

In the 80's, there was no way to find "glove prints." Not everyone wore mittens made out of Big-Foot wool.

Nobody cares that you popped next door and annoyed the medics trying to save your neighbour. I had a neighbour like you once, and I used to lob slugs over the fence. And pretended to be out when they knocked on to beg for milk and teabags.

Keep on doing what you do, Clappy. You're helping Bamber so much!!

Oh, and keep on sending that big lump of your pension. You never know, you might get a Christmas card from Mick Philpott this year!! Lucky old you!!

[adam]

Lookout is one of the few posters who I'm not sure why she supports Bamber. Her main jist seems to be that there have been previous incidents where mothers have killed their children.

Other supporters,  their reasons for support is clearer. The support never being based on the forensic evidence.

JackieD & Susan support Bamber because Julie identified the twins. Notsure said this week she is leaning towards innocence because Bamber has spent 32 years protesting his innocence. Buddy said Bamber should have 'lobbed Julie overboard' while TomG said (then denied saying) Bamber 'used a totally inappropriate weapon'.

Nugs did discuss one piece of forensic evidence. Accusing the relatives of fabricating the silencer. But would only answer 4 of my 16 questions on this.

David did say the case is built on 'forged evidence & perjury'. I assume he refers to both the the forensic & circumstantial evidence which convicted Bamber. He has refused to suggest how this vast operation was carried out so quickly & successfully.

[Samson]

It is a fallacy to imagine a vast operation.
The machinery of public and media gullibility affords huge credibility to one rogue operand.
We know the mantle scratches occurred after the crime scene was photographed yet they prove a struggle before the crime scene was photographed.

[scipio_usmc]

It is a fallacy to imagine a vast operation.
The machinery of public and media gullibility affords huge credibility to one rogue operand.
We know the mantle scratches occurred after the crime scene was photographed yet they prove a struggle before the crime scene was photographed.

There is no evidence that proves the mantle scratches were done after there is simply the allegation which was thoroughly rejected by the courts as mere speculation.

[Samson]

There is no evidence that proves the mantle scratches were done after there is simply the allegation which was thoroughly rejected by the courts as mere speculation.

The scratches occurred by dragging. The scratches were not there when the bodies were discovered, they were planted. This in itself proves nothing, because (noble) cause corruption is commonplace. I remember the day the police discovered the cartridge case Inspector Bruce Hutton planted to create evidence against Arthur Allan Thomas. This does not prove his innocence, other evidence does.
In fact in a similar vein as the photographs prove these scratches, that garden had been seive searched. I don't know how anyone can think a man with a shattered elbow shoulder and mouth engages in this nonsensical and mythical struggle, but let the hoax continue...

[APRIL]

The scratches occurred by dragging. The scratches were not there when the bodies were discovered, they were planted. This in itself proves nothing, because (noble) cause corruption is commonplace. I remember the day the police discovered the cartridge case Inspector Bruce Hutton planted to create evidence against Arthur Allan Thomas. This does not prove his innocence, other evidence does.

Just because no one noticed the scratches isn't proof that they weren't there.

[Samson]

ion

Just because no one noticed the scratches isn't proof that they weren't there.

April: The crime scene photos include the mantlepiece, and require attention. Don't be suckered by this nonsense, concentrate on other evidence to help your friends here.

[Myster]

It is a fallacy to imagine a vast operation.
The machinery of public and media gullibility affords huge credibility to one rogue operand.
We know the mantle scratches occurred after the crime scene was photographed yet they prove a struggle before the crime scene was photographed.

Why do you always say "We know this, that and the other..." when what you really mean is "I mistakenly think..."?

[Samson]

Why do you always say "We know this, that and the other..." when what you really mean is "I mistakenly think..."?

Myster:
I communicate with organisations that see these patterns of malfeasance and injustice all the time. You are a young man in relativistic terms, and your greatest achievement will now rest on helping get Jeremy Bamber out of jail.

[Myster]

Myster:
I communicate with organisations that see these patterns of malfeasance and injustice all the time. You are a young man in relativistic terms, and your greatest achievement will now rest on helping get Jeremy Bamber out of jail.

Then you should join his phony propaganda-spreading campaign (or some other favourite) to lobby the government and see how far that gets you, because flattery about age or potential influence won't result in any volte-face by me. Better still, team up with Holly, more sensible and intelligent, although mistaken... if you can find out where she's disappeared to.

[Samson]

Then you should join his phony propaganda-spreading campaign (or some other favourite) to lobby the government and see how far that gets you, because flattery about age or potential ilfluence won't result in any volte-face by me. Better still, team up with Holly, more sensible and intelligent, although mistaken... if you can find out where she's disappeared to.

The only point in posting on these message boards is to spread unease about wrongful convictions. No one would respond if they regarded the matter as correctly settled, and this one is not. Raw intelligence is irrelevant, because a limited application of whatever one possesses finds insuperable problems for the prosecution to overcome in Bamber.
Release him, he is innocent. Holly is on holiday.

[Caroline]

The only point in posting on these message boards is to spread unease about wrongful convictions. No one would respond if they regarded the matter as correctly settled, and this one is not. Raw intelligence is irrelevant, because a limited application of whatever one possesses finds insuperable problems for the prosecution to overcome in Bamber.
Release him, he is innocent. Holly is on holiday.

What problems? The buckets?

[John]

The only point in posting on these message boards is to spread unease about wrongful convictions. No one would respond if they regarded the matter as correctly settled, and this one is not. Raw intelligence is irrelevant, because a limited application of whatever one possesses finds insuperable problems for the prosecution to overcome in Bamber.
Release him, he is innocent. Holly is on holiday.

Just the slight problem of a deficiency in exculpatory evidence.