The podcast is over 2 hours so won't listen to it.
If anyone was able to face it, be good to get a summary.
The funniest bit was when Jason Holmes asked Trudi what evidence she had uncovered and she couldn't provide a single example choosing instead to revert back to her default position. A load of wauffle...we have the evidence...blah blah...
I suspect Jason Holmes was very selective with the listeners comments and blanked everyone who didn't support the Bamber propaganda, a poor example of unbiased reporting.
In part 2 of the podcast the polygraph is put forward as evidence in support of Bamber. Benjamin says that the polygraph operator Terry Mullins claims that it cannot be beaten. We know that to be untrue, there are many examples out there where polygraph results have been found wanting. In any event, a polygraph taken three decades after the event is of little significance.
Reference is made to the Stokenchurch report in which it is stated that a 999 call was made to police from WHF at 6.09am when in fact it was explained that this was BT connecting to the open line. More attempts to create something out of nothing. How desperate can people be? One doesn't have to be a genius to work out that had that in fact occurred then the police would have forced entry there and then. Yvonne Hartley again accuses Essex Police of falsifying evidence by altering documents.
They then turn attention to the 'family' and the contents of the Bamber's wills. Hartley then defames Robert Boutflour and claims that he tricked granny Mable Speakman into disinheriting Jeremy Bamber. She claims that the Boutflours manipulated the situation against Bamber when they found out that David and Ann were going to inherit very small sums of cash and no land. "They weren't letting Speakman money go to anyone who wasn't blood".
Benjamin pours scorn on Mugford and asks why she attacked Bamber in her statements and trial testimony when she was supposed to have loved him. She suggests Mugford was nothing more than a gold-digger. She suggests that the Bamber's status within the community was inconsistent with Sheila being guilty of murder. That Sheila's illness was played down and swept under the carpet. Benjamin thinks that the authorities were concerned for the twins yet there was no evidence to support that claim. Hartley claims that the jury didn't hear that the twins had burn/scald marks on them suggesting that a mentally deranged Sheila was responsible. Benjamin claims that Jeremy was concerned that Nevill would have been angry at him for calling the police. (Strange since Nevill himself was supposed to have done just that?)
Benjamin and Hartley are asked to give key points which in their view could prove Jeremy's innocence.
We have 12 pieces of irrefutable evidence that Sheila was still alive.
We know that there was a 999 call made at 6.09am.
We know that he could not have got in and out of those with windows, that scene was still secure from the inside so the only person who could have killed that family were still in there.
We know that both Nevill Bamber and Jeremy Bamber phoned the police. There were two telephone calls.
We know tbat there were scratch marks on the mantlepiece yet didn't appear on CSI photos.
The crimescene was manipulated, Sheila's body was moved, the Bible was moved.
We have evidence to counter the claim that the rifle was too long for Sheila to have shot herself.
That the jury wasn't told that the silencer blood matched Robert Boutflour.
It has never been proven that Sheila's DNA was found near that silencer.
When it was suggested that Nevill Bamber being a magistrate would have been too proud to phone the police, Benjamin responds that Nevill phoned the police, that it has been proven, that it wasn't one call. She claims that it was made to look like one call from Jeremy but it was two calls, it can only be two calls, it was not a relayed conversation.
Podcast ends with an appeal for information and for people to come forward. Asking for further donations to pay for forensic analyses. Asking for people to sign their thunderclap petition which goes out on the 28th October which has a potential to reach 200,000 people.
Hartley boasting that they ample evidence to prosecute those people who have fabricated evidence in Jeremy's case.
Benjamin wants to get more people outraged. "GOD help those people who get in the firing line!"
Jason Holmes ends stating that he is "absolutely convinced" that Jeremy Bamber is innocent.
Holmes: "There is nothing that would convince me that Jeremy committed this crime based upon the evidence that I have seen".
