In May this year... Tabak admitted Jo's Manslaughter..But that was only part of the story.... The Crown's Case Is... And always has been... That it was a deliberate act... on his part.... And that is why we refused to accept his plea to 'Manslaughter"
Ann... Answer me this..... How could you have always Known that it was a deliberate act???
You didn't know Dr Vincent Tabak's side of the story.....
So by this "STATEMENT ANN" are you conceding that you "Always knew That Joanna Yeates" ... "WAS DELIBERATLEY MURDERED"
How can you know this Ann ????
What else did you know ANN??
I keep looking at the video statemnet that ANN reads out at the end of trial.... And even then she has slipped up....
Shes' says and I again will quote..
Vincent Tabak, became the focus of their attention following the finding of DNA on Jo's body
I will quote the next bit,,, but I'm loving this bit.... I have quoted the whole transcrpit before... Again.... skim skim skim... we all so it even when watching a video.. not really paying attention ...
Now... How can Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA have been found on Joanna Yeates body before they took a DNA sample from him in Holland on 31st December 2010.. Not only that DCI Phil Jones states that it was around. "The 20th January 2011 that they got a match to Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA???? In the Judge Rinder Program ????
How can Dr Vincent Tabak become the focus...
Again...
Vincent Tabak, became the focus of their attention following the finding of DNA on Jo's body
How can Dr Vincent Tabak become the focus of any investigation just because they have found DNA on Joanna Yeates body.... Ann doesn't say Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA... she just say's DNA... So How could Dr Vincent Tabak become 'The Focus" of any Investigation.....
What is ANN REDDROP actually admitting to here ?????
Late in December the Police asked for assistance and guidence from The Crown Prosecution Service... That assistance has come from The South West Complex Case Work Unit based here in Bristol.. I reviewed the evidence.. Advised that Vincent Tabak should be charged with Jo's murder and began preparing the case for trial
Wow... Now Ann... If DCI Phil Jones did not recieve a match to Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA sample that was apparently taken on(31st December 2010) till around the 20th January 2011... How did you manage to review the case and how did DCI Phil Jones manage to bang up a Judge to get an arrest warrant for around 6:00am in the morning on 20th January 2011...???
It's not a difficult question.... But an answer would be appreciated..... Pretty Please.......ok... Pretty Please with A Cherry On Top....
We also have to remember that the 'Crime Watch' program told us it took "WEEKS" for this sample of DNA on Joanna Yeates body to be analysed... So again Ann...or DCI Phil Jones.... please tell me how Dr Vincent Tabak became the focus of your Investigation after you had matched his DNA around the 20th January 2011 and had an Arrest warrant issued on the 20th January And The Head of The Complex Crime Unit Reviewed this Information... leaving you with only "6" hours of Investigation time available to conclusively prove that Dr Vincent Tabak was indeed 'YOUR MAN"??? Not only that "6" Hours in which to
(A): Investigate Dr Vincent Tabak
(B): Have CCTV of Dr Vincent Tabak
(C): Have interviewed Tanja Morson in relation to Dr Vincent Tabak's movement on 17th December 2010
(D): Had checked his phone records
(E): Had checked whether or not "His" car went over Clifton Suspension Bridge on the 18th December 2010
(F): Had got all the evidence you both would need to 'Charge Dr Vincent Tabak on the 20th January 2011
(G): Typed up you reports
(H): Sent a report 'TO' ANN REDDROP
(I): Ann Redropp Reading this complex report for this complex crime.... And then "Arresting Dr Vincent tabak in '6"
Hours"
If this wasn't so serious it would be LAUGHABLE....!!!!
Now... That has to be a record by anyones standards....
Does Ann Reddrop's admission that Joanna Yeates being Murdered and they always... according to ANN Reddrop knew that this was the case.... Is it possible that the talk of Joanna Yeates being abducted was already in Ann Reddrop's Case file ???
WHY else would she be so adament???
She doesn't flinch... She doesn't waiver..... She is as far as I can tell 100% sure that Joanna Yeates was "Murdered"... (IMO).... She was 100% sure that Dr Vincent Tabak committed this MURDER.....
And how can that be possible... How can she be 100% sure on both counts.... When according to what DCI Phil Jones says in The Judge Rinder Program... They got matched components of Dr Vincent Tabak's DNA with Joanna Yeates DNA sample around the 20th January 2011??????...
Leaving him just 6 hours to Investigate, apply for a warrant to arrest... type up his report go and see Ann Reddrop with the report... her review The Case ... and finally turn up at Aberdeen Road in the wee hours of the morning of 20th January 2010???
Now unless DCI Phil Jones has the ability to time travel... And Police Boxes are indeed Tardis's... It is an IMPOSSIBILITY for him to have Investigate Dr Vincent Tabak after they had a supposed match to the DNA found on Joanna Yeates body....
Making it... They had been looking for a scapegoat... all along... (IMO)... And they set up Dr Vincent Tabak from start to finish....(IMO)... It is the only explanation I can see...
Meaning..... as I have always said.... DR VINCENT TABAK IS INNOCENT!!!!! They Never had a case against Dr Vincent Tabak... (IMO)... They just made it up as they went along...... "The Manslaughter Plea " at the Old Bailey should be testament to that.... (IMO)...
So Ann.... what did you actually know about Joanna Yeates Murder that Nobody else appeared to know ????
Again... we have to come back to someone being 'Protected"... And that definatley was NOT...
Dr Vincent Tabak .."The Placid Dutchman !!!!! (IMO)... Dr Vincent Tabak "The Placid Dutchman" was SOMEONES!!!!....
Get Out Of Jail Free Card!!!! (IMO)... http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/exterior-shot-ann-reddrop-crown-prosecution-service-makes-news-footage/131193037Edit.... Is Ann Reddrop conceding that they already had the results of the DNA sample found on Joanna Yeates body by late December 2010... by her statement.... ?? And is that why you contacted the "Dutch Authorities" to interview Dr Vincent Tabak Ann???? So that Interview has to that of a "SUSPECT "Ann.... because realistically you would have NO need to Contact The Dutch Authorities in Relation to speaking to Dr Vincent Tabak.... Which again means he should of had his 'Right" read to him and cautioned.... (IMO)....