I think it’s because he suggested that was Amaral’s motivation. Amaral says that it was to defend his honour and it is not up to us to second guess him. I also received points for pointing out that Mr Sillence was probably paid by the Sun for his story.
Fair is fair I suppose.
He? He?? Who are you talking about?
Amaral may well have resigned to "defend his honour" and the best and most lucrative way he knew how to do that was to cash in on the case by writing a book and appearing on countless TV programmes for which he charged large sums of cash. He could only have done this by retiring from the police. You made a statement of fact about Sillence (no "probablys" or "IMOs") based on zero evidence, and with a cavalier attitude that you couldn't care less about being sued or about John getting into legal hotw..er. I believe you were put on moderation for your efforts.
ETA: What is supremely ironic about your obvious libel of Sillence is that when I asked G-Unit (twice) whether or not she felt your post was acceptable she both ignored my posts and let your post stand.
