What rules are you referring to?
was suggesting that you can't cherry pick what to believe in a persons's statement, unless it is corroborated by a 3rd person.
Is that what you have done too. You don't say the McCanns or the Tapas 7 did anything other than what you can find in the file?
That is what I am doing. To make all Charlotte's statements true she has to go to the apartment then return to work until all the kids are sent home IMO. Was the lady picking up the child the last child? If so she didn't abandon any other kids?
What does she say about how many kids had to be picked up in the Dispatches documentary?
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=10342.msg499392#msg499392"Transcription 2:
'I was working that night at something called 'Drop-in Creche'. We had one child left and... errm, the mother came in, picked up the child and just mentioned 'Hang on a minute, I've just seen a guy who's run past me, who seemed really distressed and I recognised him as being a guest at Mark Warner, but he was shouting out something like 'Maddie' or 'Abbey' or 'Gabby'.'"
So if that is correct and they all went together they weren't abandoning any other kids, so what did she have to stay back for?
It is hard to understand what Charlotte and her friends were saying as it is written but then again I can't accept it is all incorrect.
If it was the last child Charlotte might not be that far behind the other two.