There was much more to that report than "gut feeling" and the fact that I do not know the outcome of this man's arrest has a significance I think if no-one else knows either.- A respected barrister told us the man boasted to him that he had met the child on a Mediterranean island. It was claimed Maddie was “introduced” to the man this summer.
- "I knew that by reporting it, it would compromise me in all sorts of ways.
- “The fact that he was prepared to risk his reputation by making the statement does suggest that it is credible.
- the barrister said: “I have told the police everything that I was told about her. They know what that was and that is why they have acted.”
- A source close to the couple said: “The arrest only happened as a result of a claim that Madeleine may still be alive.”
well obviously...it went nowhere ...
a family source said it was high on the credible list ...so why report it...
the vibes coming from this...is the man obviously liked children...
without going further...into it computers removed etc..
so why was he associating with him... imo god knows what the party was he was attending
don't think just because he was a barrister....that makes him credible....it doesn't
IMO ...I think it sounds like it could easily have been an act of revenge....
don't read the story .....read between the lines....
He explained: “I cannot risk compromising the investigation or the search for Madeleine. If she is alive but now disappears again, I would never be able to forgive myself.why did he take this to a newspaper then......