Author Topic: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision  (Read 22828 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Harvey

Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« on: June 08, 2012, 08:37:20 PM »
Did you know that Simon McKay was at the High Court seeking permission to raise a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of the CCRC in the Jeremy Bamber case?

Offline Jerry

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #1 on: September 05, 2012, 08:44:21 PM »
Did you know that Simon McKay was at the High Court seeking permission to raise a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of the CCRC in the Jeremy Bamber case?
Does anyone know when we are likely to hear the decision?   8-)(--)

Offline John

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #2 on: September 05, 2012, 08:54:31 PM »
Did you know that Simon McKay was at the High Court seeking permission to raise a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of the CCRC in the Jeremy Bamber case?
Does anyone know when we are likely to hear the decision?   8-)(--)

It is expected some time this month and the sooner the better for all concerned.  David was right...time this charade was brought to an end...for GOOD!
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline Milly

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #3 on: September 05, 2012, 09:00:08 PM »
Did you know that Simon McKay was at the High Court seeking permission to raise a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of the CCRC in the Jeremy Bamber case?
Does anyone know when we are likely to hear the decision?   8-)(--)

It is expected some time this month and the sooner the better for all concerned.  David was right...time this charade was brought to an end...for GOOD!
I saw David at the open day but didn't get a chance to speak to him at the time as there were so may people swarming around.  Jeremy Bamber is not the sort of subject you raise in polite conversation is it?   8(8-))

Offline John

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #4 on: September 05, 2012, 09:05:40 PM »
Did you know that Simon McKay was at the High Court seeking permission to raise a Judicial Review in relation to the decision of the CCRC in the Jeremy Bamber case?
Does anyone know when we are likely to hear the decision?   8-)(--)

It is expected some time this month and the sooner the better for all concerned.  David was right...time this charade was brought to an end...for GOOD!
I saw David at the open day but didn't get a chance to speak to him at the time as there were so may people swarming around.  Jeremy Bamber is not the sort of subject you raise in polite conversation is it?   8(8-))

Deffo a conversation KILLER!   @)(++(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #5 on: September 06, 2012, 11:58:20 AM »
Have a care susan ingham. Your jackie preece is showing    8(0(*
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Angelo222

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #6 on: September 06, 2012, 01:07:51 PM »
Have a care susan ingham. Your jackie preece is showing    8(0(*

I must say this is quite amusing.  I am not in the habit of following the nonsense on the Jeremy Bamber forum but what is the point of a lifetime ban on the forum when you can post using a false name? 
De troothe has the annoying habit of coming to the surface just when you least expect it!!

Je ne regrette rien!!

Offline Joanne

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #7 on: September 06, 2012, 01:21:15 PM »
Possibly a mixture of 'hidemywhatsits' and 'anotherfakename'?

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #8 on: September 06, 2012, 05:04:23 PM »
Have a care susan ingham. Your jackie preece is showing    8(0(*

nearly 3000 posts. on there 12 hours a day. who else could it be?   @)(++(*
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Myster

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #9 on: September 06, 2012, 07:45:35 PM »
Have a care susan ingham. Your jackie preece is showing    8(0(*

nearly 3000 posts. on there 12 hours a day. who else could it be?   @)(++(*


It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Joanne

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #10 on: September 06, 2012, 07:56:37 PM »
Who is Susan Ingham? Aside being a member of the Jeremy Bamber forum and a prolific poster.

Offline Myster

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #11 on: September 06, 2012, 08:13:35 PM »
Who is Susan Ingham? Aside being a member of the Jeremy Bamber forum and a prolific poster.

Our dear beloved Jackie......who seems to have disappeared from here.  ?>)()<

It's one of them cases, in'it... one of them f*ckin' cases.

Offline Joanne

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #12 on: September 06, 2012, 08:25:35 PM »
Ok, thanks. 8((()*/

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #13 on: September 06, 2012, 09:43:03 PM »
That blue forum   @)(++(*

Who needs Big Brother?
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #14 on: September 06, 2012, 09:53:32 PM »
That blue forum   @)(++(*

Who needs Big Brother?

I think someone likes a drink or two!
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.