Author Topic: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision  (Read 22825 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #30 on: September 09, 2012, 10:36:51 PM »
Have you seen the blue forum is going back over the old ground of the figure at the window? OK, so if two police officers and Jeremy had definitely seen a figure at the window then surely this lets JB off the hook? And Jeremy didn't seem to think this was important until Tesko told him it was in prison? They seem to think this alleged sighting is what brought about the decision to bring in the firearms unit-of course this had nothing to do with Jeremy painting a picture of a psychotic woman with loaded guns all over the place. As I have said before conspiracy theories are all very well but what did the police have to gain by framing Jeremy when all the evidence at the scene initially appeared to be a cut and dried murder/suicide? If the figure in the window was definitely real then Bamber would have brought this up in police interviews and the trial. The fact he did not suggests it is all lies.

I just don't believe that JB and two witnesses saw a backlit figure walk across a window, or that Mike has at least three copies of Sheila with a single wound, or that there are phone logs that conclusively prove that Ralph made any call from WHF.

JB pleads "I am appealing for any help at all, however insignificant." So why would Mike insist on holding on to evidence "for a rainy day"? It's been pissing down for JB for 27 years.

You are absolutely spot on as usual Shona.  Of course Mike Teskowski doesn't have any of that information, it is all a big game for him now.  If there surfaced genuine material which could clear Jeremy I would be the first to promote it but I fear that it is a case of don't hold your breath!

I believe Jackie has been up front with us all about Jeremy and she now too can see what is really going on.

John I have to disaggree with you here - Shona is not always 'spot on...!'

I recently came to learn that she had been spreading malicious lies about Jackie and when I questioned her about these lies, instead of answering the questions posed she did what she does best and attempted to belittle me and my gorgeous husband, along with all other MOJ victims and their families - by bragging that she had been out for a meal and had 'sea-bass.'

We have some great little fishmongers in this region who sell all sorts of fresh catches of the day - therefore why she felt the need to post on a public forum what she had eaten at her local diner is beyond me.

I also wonder why people bother to waste their time and energy in the hope they will keep someone in prison... This is ludicrous... I cannot fathom why anyone with some knowlegde of our justice system would do this. What do they hope to gain? Or are they just intent on causing disruption?

Blimey, don't you tell some WHOPPERS!!!!! I have never "belittled" Simon, as you well know. Trust me, he has my every sympathy, the poor guy deserves a medal as big as a dustbin lid.


mmmmm, sea bass.....

Oh I wondered when you would pop up Shona...

Now - can you please tell me about the lies you spread about Jackie posting photo's of your daughter...

Oh and do me a favour Shona - don't start patronising my gorgeous hubby.... You have no freaking idea what he has had to endure these past ten years so do not go putting dustbin lids around his neck...! Show a bit of respect!



Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #31 on: September 09, 2012, 10:41:10 PM »
Have you seen the blue forum is going back over the old ground of the figure at the window? OK, so if two police officers and Jeremy had definitely seen a figure at the window then surely this lets JB off the hook? And Jeremy didn't seem to think this was important until Tesko told him it was in prison? They seem to think this alleged sighting is what brought about the decision to bring in the firearms unit-of course this had nothing to do with Jeremy painting a picture of a psychotic woman with loaded guns all over the place. As I have said before conspiracy theories are all very well but what did the police have to gain by framing Jeremy when all the evidence at the scene initially appeared to be a cut and dried murder/suicide? If the figure in the window was definitely real then Bamber would have brought this up in police interviews and the trial. The fact he did not suggests it is all lies.

I just don't believe that JB and two witnesses saw a backlit figure walk across a window, or that Mike has at least three copies of Sheila with a single wound, or that there are phone logs that conclusively prove that Ralph made any call from WHF.

JB pleads "I am appealing for any help at all, however insignificant." So why would Mike insist on holding on to evidence "for a rainy day"? It's been pissing down for JB for 27 years.

You are absolutely spot on as usual Shona.  Of course Mike Teskowski doesn't have any of that information, it is all a big game for him now.  If there surfaced genuine material which could clear Jeremy I would be the first to promote it but I fear that it is a case of don't hold your breath!

I believe Jackie has been up front with us all about Jeremy and she now too can see what is really going on.

John I have to disaggree with you here - Shona is not always 'spot on...!'

I recently came to learn that she had been spreading malicious lies about Jackie and when I questioned her about these lies, instead of answering the questions posed she did what she does best and attempted to belittle me and my gorgeous husband, along with all other MOJ victims and their families - by bragging that she had been out for a meal and had 'sea-bass.'

We have some great little fishmongers in this region who sell all sorts of fresh catches of the day - therefore why she felt the need to post on a public forum what she had eaten at her local diner is beyond me.

I also wonder why people bother to waste their time and energy in the hope they will keep someone in prison... This is ludicrous... I cannot fathom why anyone with some knowlegde of our justice system would do this. What do they hope to gain? Or are they just intent on causing disruption?

Blimey, don't you tell some WHOPPERS!!!!! I have never "belittled" Simon, as you well know. Trust me, he has my every sympathy, the poor guy deserves a medal as big as a dustbin lid.


mmmmm, sea bass.....

Oh I wondered when you would pop up Shona...

Now - can you please tell me about the lies you spread about Jackie posting photo's of your daughter...

Oh and do me a favour Shona - don't start patronising my gorgeous hubby.... You have no freaking idea what he has had to endure these past ten years so do not go putting dustbin lids around his neck...! Show a bit of respect!

Show a bit of respect? To you?   @)(++(*  I'll say whatever I like about Simon, he seems like a really nice guy, and what a hottie!! And get your facts right, fuzzy-top, Jackie made a comment about my daughter, there was never any photo, we've talked about it and sorted it.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #32 on: September 09, 2012, 10:44:02 PM »
Is someone gonna tell me what Jackie does for a living then or what....since it has been mentioned???    ?{)(**
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

madomma

  • Guest
Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #33 on: September 09, 2012, 10:47:11 PM »
Is someone gonna tell me what Jackie does for a living then or what....since it has been mentioned???    ?{)(**
it cant be anything good to be mentioned in such a way.   

Offline Nicholas

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #34 on: September 09, 2012, 10:48:22 PM »
Have you seen the blue forum is going back over the old ground of the figure at the window? OK, so if two police officers and Jeremy had definitely seen a figure at the window then surely this lets JB off the hook? And Jeremy didn't seem to think this was important until Tesko told him it was in prison? They seem to think this alleged sighting is what brought about the decision to bring in the firearms unit-of course this had nothing to do with Jeremy painting a picture of a psychotic woman with loaded guns all over the place. As I have said before conspiracy theories are all very well but what did the police have to gain by framing Jeremy when all the evidence at the scene initially appeared to be a cut and dried murder/suicide? If the figure in the window was definitely real then Bamber would have brought this up in police interviews and the trial. The fact he did not suggests it is all lies.

I just don't believe that JB and two witnesses saw a backlit figure walk across a window, or that Mike has at least three copies of Sheila with a single wound, or that there are phone logs that conclusively prove that Ralph made any call from WHF.

JB pleads "I am appealing for any help at all, however insignificant." So why would Mike insist on holding on to evidence "for a rainy day"? It's been pissing down for JB for 27 years.

You are absolutely spot on as usual Shona.  Of course Mike Teskowski doesn't have any of that information, it is all a big game for him now.  If there surfaced genuine material which could clear Jeremy I would be the first to promote it but I fear that it is a case of don't hold your breath!

I believe Jackie has been up front with us all about Jeremy and she now too can see what is really going on.

John I have to disaggree with you here - Shona is not always 'spot on...!'

I recently came to learn that she had been spreading malicious lies about Jackie and when I questioned her about these lies, instead of answering the questions posed she did what she does best and attempted to belittle me and my gorgeous husband, along with all other MOJ victims and their families - by bragging that she had been out for a meal and had 'sea-bass.'

We have some great little fishmongers in this region who sell all sorts of fresh catches of the day - therefore why she felt the need to post on a public forum what she had eaten at her local diner is beyond me.

I also wonder why people bother to waste their time and energy in the hope they will keep someone in prison... This is ludicrous... I cannot fathom why anyone with some knowlegde of our justice system would do this. What do they hope to gain? Or are they just intent on causing disruption?

Blimey, don't you tell some WHOPPERS!!!!! I have never "belittled" Simon, as you well know. Trust me, he has my every sympathy, the poor guy deserves a medal as big as a dustbin lid.


mmmmm, sea bass.....

Oh I wondered when you would pop up Shona...

Now - can you please tell me about the lies you spread about Jackie posting photo's of your daughter...

Oh and do me a favour Shona - don't start patronising my gorgeous hubby.... You have no freaking idea what he has had to endure these past ten years so do not go putting dustbin lids around his neck...! Show a bit of respect!

Show a bit of respect? To you?   @)(++(*  I'll say whatever I like about Simon, he seems like a really nice guy, and what a hottie!! And get your facts right, fuzzy-top, Jackie made a comment about my daughter, there was never any photo, we've talked about it and sorted it.

Shona you came straight on here with yet another snide comment - good to see you posting under your own name for once though.

Please don't keep up the pretence re your daughter though - your own actions caused Jackie a lot of grief Shona!! Your actions and what you did on a public forum still have an impact on Jackie today....

Why do you call Jackie 'fuzzy top' or is this to me? Is that like 'copper knob?'
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

madomma

  • Guest
Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #35 on: September 09, 2012, 10:48:54 PM »
you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #36 on: September 09, 2012, 10:52:59 PM »
Have you seen the blue forum is going back over the old ground of the figure at the window? OK, so if two police officers and Jeremy had definitely seen a figure at the window then surely this lets JB off the hook? And Jeremy didn't seem to think this was important until Tesko told him it was in prison? They seem to think this alleged sighting is what brought about the decision to bring in the firearms unit-of course this had nothing to do with Jeremy painting a picture of a psychotic woman with loaded guns all over the place. As I have said before conspiracy theories are all very well but what did the police have to gain by framing Jeremy when all the evidence at the scene initially appeared to be a cut and dried murder/suicide? If the figure in the window was definitely real then Bamber would have brought this up in police interviews and the trial. The fact he did not suggests it is all lies.

I just don't believe that JB and two witnesses saw a backlit figure walk across a window, or that Mike has at least three copies of Sheila with a single wound, or that there are phone logs that conclusively prove that Ralph made any call from WHF.

JB pleads "I am appealing for any help at all, however insignificant." So why would Mike insist on holding on to evidence "for a rainy day"? It's been pissing down for JB for 27 years.

You are absolutely spot on as usual Shona.  Of course Mike Teskowski doesn't have any of that information, it is all a big game for him now.  If there surfaced genuine material which could clear Jeremy I would be the first to promote it but I fear that it is a case of don't hold your breath!

I believe Jackie has been up front with us all about Jeremy and she now too can see what is really going on.

John I have to disaggree with you here - Shona is not always 'spot on...!'

I recently came to learn that she had been spreading malicious lies about Jackie and when I questioned her about these lies, instead of answering the questions posed she did what she does best and attempted to belittle me and my gorgeous husband, along with all other MOJ victims and their families - by bragging that she had been out for a meal and had 'sea-bass.'

We have some great little fishmongers in this region who sell all sorts of fresh catches of the day - therefore why she felt the need to post on a public forum what she had eaten at her local diner is beyond me.

I also wonder why people bother to waste their time and energy in the hope they will keep someone in prison... This is ludicrous... I cannot fathom why anyone with some knowlegde of our justice system would do this. What do they hope to gain? Or are they just intent on causing disruption?

Blimey, don't you tell some WHOPPERS!!!!! I have never "belittled" Simon, as you well know. Trust me, he has my every sympathy, the poor guy deserves a medal as big as a dustbin lid.


mmmmm, sea bass.....

Oh I wondered when you would pop up Shona...

Now - can you please tell me about the lies you spread about Jackie posting photo's of your daughter...

Oh and do me a favour Shona - don't start patronising my gorgeous hubby.... You have no freaking idea what he has had to endure these past ten years so do not go putting dustbin lids around his neck...! Show a bit of respect!

Show a bit of respect? To you?   @)(++(*  I'll say whatever I like about Simon, he seems like a really nice guy, and what a hottie!! And get your facts right, fuzzy-top, Jackie made a comment about my daughter, there was never any photo, we've talked about it and sorted it.

Shona you came straight on here with yet another snide comment - good to see you posting under your own name for once though.

Please don't keep up the pretence re your daughter though - your own actions caused Jackie a lot of grief Shona!! Your actions and what you did on a public forum still have an impact on Jackie today....

Why do you call Jackie 'fuzzy top' or is this to me? Is that like 'copper knob?'

Why would I call Jac fuzzy-top? That would be very silly.

Stephanie. We could do this all night, tit for tat, you being noisy and ranty, me being funny and really cool, but it gets boring after a while. No one actually gives a monkies about you, because of this ground-hog day crap that you churn out. You are Simon's voice. A little decorum, if you please!!
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline Nicholas

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #37 on: September 09, 2012, 10:55:18 PM »
you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)

This should be interesting....  @)(++(*

I believe this falls under 'Defamation of charactor....'

Some of you may want to go back over Jackie's previous posts - she did try to warn you but it would appear you did not listen...

Come on then smart ass Andrea - you started all this so tell us what you know.... or what you think you know..

Be careful though - you don't want to end up in court now do you?
Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

Offline Matthew Wyse

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #38 on: September 09, 2012, 10:55:37 PM »
you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)


A Ford Escort    @)(++(*   @)(++(*
Most people suspect the truth but few are able to admit it.

Offline Andrea

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #39 on: September 09, 2012, 10:57:33 PM »
you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)

This should be interesting....  @)(++(*

I believe this falls under 'Defamation of charactor....'

Some of you may want to go back over Jackie's previous posts - she did try to warn you but it would appear you did not listen...

Come on then smart ass Andrea - you started all this so tell us what you know.... or what you think you know..

Be careful though - you don't want to end up in court now do you?


Dum dum de dum, i never said a word steph!

Offline Andrea

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #40 on: September 09, 2012, 10:57:55 PM »
But if people want to guess, i cant stop them, can i?

Offline Nicholas

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #41 on: September 09, 2012, 10:58:10 PM »
Have you seen the blue forum is going back over the old ground of the figure at the window? OK, so if two police officers and Jeremy had definitely seen a figure at the window then surely this lets JB off the hook? And Jeremy didn't seem to think this was important until Tesko told him it was in prison? They seem to think this alleged sighting is what brought about the decision to bring in the firearms unit-of course this had nothing to do with Jeremy painting a picture of a psychotic woman with loaded guns all over the place. As I have said before conspiracy theories are all very well but what did the police have to gain by framing Jeremy when all the evidence at the scene initially appeared to be a cut and dried murder/suicide? If the figure in the window was definitely real then Bamber would have brought this up in police interviews and the trial. The fact he did not suggests it is all lies.

I just don't believe that JB and two witnesses saw a backlit figure walk across a window, or that Mike has at least three copies of Sheila with a single wound, or that there are phone logs that conclusively prove that Ralph made any call from WHF.

JB pleads "I am appealing for any help at all, however insignificant." So why would Mike insist on holding on to evidence "for a rainy day"? It's been pissing down for JB for 27 years.

You are absolutely spot on as usual Shona.  Of course Mike Teskowski doesn't have any of that information, it is all a big game for him now.  If there surfaced genuine material which could clear Jeremy I would be the first to promote it but I fear that it is a case of don't hold your breath!

I believe Jackie has been up front with us all about Jeremy and she now too can see what is really going on.

John I have to disaggree with you here - Shona is not always 'spot on...!'

I recently came to learn that she had been spreading malicious lies about Jackie and when I questioned her about these lies, instead of answering the questions posed she did what she does best and attempted to belittle me and my gorgeous husband, along with all other MOJ victims and their families - by bragging that she had been out for a meal and had 'sea-bass.'

We have some great little fishmongers in this region who sell all sorts of fresh catches of the day - therefore why she felt the need to post on a public forum what she had eaten at her local diner is beyond me.

I also wonder why people bother to waste their time and energy in the hope they will keep someone in prison... This is ludicrous... I cannot fathom why anyone with some knowlegde of our justice system would do this. What do they hope to gain? Or are they just intent on causing disruption?

Blimey, don't you tell some WHOPPERS!!!!! I have never "belittled" Simon, as you well know. Trust me, he has my every sympathy, the poor guy deserves a medal as big as a dustbin lid.


mmmmm, sea bass.....

Oh I wondered when you would pop up Shona...

Now - can you please tell me about the lies you spread about Jackie posting photo's of your daughter...

Oh and do me a favour Shona - don't start patronising my gorgeous hubby.... You have no freaking idea what he has had to endure these past ten years so do not go putting dustbin lids around his neck...! Show a bit of respect!

Show a bit of respect? To you?   @)(++(*  I'll say whatever I like about Simon, he seems like a really nice guy, and what a hottie!! And get your facts right, fuzzy-top, Jackie made a comment about my daughter, there was never any photo, we've talked about it and sorted it.

Shona you came straight on here with yet another snide comment - good to see you posting under your own name for once though.

Please don't keep up the pretence re your daughter though - your own actions caused Jackie a lot of grief Shona!! Your actions and what you did on a public forum still have an impact on Jackie today....

Why do you call Jackie 'fuzzy top' or is this to me? Is that like 'copper knob?'

Why would I call Jac fuzzy-top? That would be very silly.

Stephanie. We could do this all night, tit for tat, you being noisy and ranty, me being funny and really cool, but it gets boring after a while. No one actually gives a monkies about you, because of this ground-hog day crap that you churn out. You are Simon's voice. A little decorum, if you please!!

Shona - yes I used to think you were funny, that was of course until I realise that you weren't and actually appear to have far bigger problems than you have let on...

Yes you go ahead and wa*k that ego of yours if it pleases you.



Who wants to take on this great massive lie?” Writer Martin Preib on the tsunami of innocence fraud sweeping our nation

madomma

  • Guest
Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #42 on: September 09, 2012, 10:58:33 PM »
touchy subject this then.  whats this all about Andrea   >@@(*&)

you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)

This should be interesting....  @)(++(*

I believe this falls under 'Defamation of charactor....'

Some of you may want to go back over Jackie's previous posts - she did try to warn you but it would appear you did not listen...

Come on then smart ass Andrea - you started all this so tell us what you know.... or what you think you know..

Be careful though - you don't want to end up in court now do you?

Offline puglove

Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #43 on: September 09, 2012, 11:00:35 PM »
Wank my ego!! I'll give anything a go, me!!

I'll be back in 3 minutes!!
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

jackie not signed in

  • Guest
Re: Bamber seeks Judicial Review of CCRC decision
« Reply #44 on: September 09, 2012, 11:02:47 PM »
you said she was an escort/?  hmmmmmm  what sort of an escort was that then??   8-)(--)

This should be interesting....  @)(++(*

I believe this falls under 'Defamation of charactor....'

Some of you may want to go back over Jackie's previous posts - she did try to warn you but it would appear you did not listen...

Come on then smart ass Andrea - you started all this so tell us what you know.... or what you think you know..

Be careful though - you don't want to end up in court now do you?


Dum dum de dum, i never said a word steph!
You sayed to much already Andrea.  Really.