Author Topic: Sheila and the wet blood theory  (Read 24637 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Patti

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #30 on: August 05, 2012, 01:02:51 AM »
Patti
That's terrible do you know if it's somebody personally responsible and were the police any help?

Hi Jackie. At first the police wasn't interested, although the image was of a child no older than 12 years old. I gave them a piece of my mind and told them who I was. I also told them I would investigate it myself, which I did and passed all the information on to CEOP....Within a couple of hours it was all deleted and is still being investigated....Ironically, the police contacted me the day after and told me that they were going to investigate it too...Ha! 24 hours too late......I could not wait, that length of time, but I still await for information concerning who/what/when/why the photo's were taken....that poor child....was she forced?

I don't care for adult porn, but when it involves children, it really gets to me....xxxxx

Patti

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #31 on: August 05, 2012, 01:08:36 AM »
Elvis
Bridget never ever thrashes Patti

She does occasionally, but I am winning 3-1  lololol  8@??)( 8@??)( 8@??)(

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #32 on: August 05, 2012, 01:16:12 AM »
Disgusting, I bet Mark Williams Thomas would be interested in that. That's the main area he investigates xxx

Patti

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #33 on: August 05, 2012, 01:23:48 AM »
Disgusting, I bet Mark Williams Thomas would be interested in that. That's the main area he investigates xxx

i did ask him to help....I suspect he helped....but closed my account down...He is one lovely man. I admire his work; along with Prof. David. Wilson. Both are criminologists. Just like me...xxxx

Patti

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #34 on: August 05, 2012, 01:26:37 AM »
Sorry I am not a criminologist....Posted that incorrectly... 8(8-))

Offline John

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #35 on: August 05, 2012, 02:06:52 AM »
I love the way someone called 'Roch' writes. I have never, come across a more hypocritical, arrogant, misguided non-entity in my life. The man (if he is, in fact, a man?) is a ticking time-bomb of conflicting half-baked barely credible theories, and a waterfall of self-delusion which often cascades into gushing praise of the equally hypocritical power zealot and fairy-tale-in-chief Mike Tesko. Roch simply cannot comprehend the notion that other people might have viewpoints that may not be the same as his own. This probably came as a big shock to someone like him. A completely brainwashed over-protective robot that sees the differing sides of the debate in the same was as a panzer general would. 'Annihilate them before they annihilate us' He drips with barely-concealed loathing and hatred for anyone that doesn't support his idol and is equally susceptible to bouts of immature unreasonable idiocy.
Roch I award you the starryian award for the most hypocritical, biased and utterly obnoxious poster on the blue forum.
We salute you!

Far be it for me to disagree with your description of the formidable Roch so I don't intend to.   @)(++(*

I notice he had a go at me on the blue forum yesterday and made a comment to the effect that I was disliked on forums.  Could it be that what is actually disliked is my ability to say it as it is and not take any prisoners?

I will say one thing for Roch though...he has managed to keep his anonymity so far.  8(0(*
A malicious prosecution for a crime which never existed. An exposé of egregious malfeasance by public officials.
Indeed, the truth never changes with the passage of time.

Offline puglove

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #36 on: August 05, 2012, 08:24:37 AM »
Elvis
Bridget never ever thrashes Patti

She does occasionally, but I am winning 3-1  lololol  8@??)( 8@??)( 8@??)(

Is that right? Bridget has thrashed the lot of you and made you look like muppets.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

Offline puglove

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #37 on: August 05, 2012, 09:01:40 AM »
Elvis
Bridget never ever thrashes Patti

She does occasionally, but I am winning 3-1  lololol  8@??)( 8@??)( 8@??)(

Is that right? Bridget has thrashed the lot of you and made you look like muppets.

Bridget is right about the gun. It's clear to see. They are a thick bunch over the road if they can't or won't see that. No wonder Bamber's still in the clink.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #38 on: August 05, 2012, 09:22:29 AM »
John in your opinion, you know  as much about what happened that night as I do

Offline puglove

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #39 on: August 05, 2012, 09:38:07 AM »
Enigma why doesn't Bridget go back to her Weety name instead of hiding behind a secret user name on here and making out she left after her row with Tim.

Bridget/Weety wouldn't know how to tell the truth if it was staring her in the face

If you don't believe me read her website just for a laugh

Or aren't you interested in the truth????

Not a clue what you're on about. Bridget is making them look like stubborn idiots. Mike Tesko, photographic expert   YOU ARE WRONG.
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #40 on: August 05, 2012, 09:44:50 AM »
I didn't say I agreed with Mike Tesko

Patti is brilliant digging to get to the truth, she is not rude either and she should be welcomed to post on this forum if you want even debate

Offline puglove

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #41 on: August 05, 2012, 09:48:07 AM »
Enigma why doesn't Bridget go back to her Weety name instead of hiding behind a secret user name on here and making out she left after her row with Tim.

Bridget/Weety wouldn't know how to tell the truth if it was staring her in the face

If you don't believe me read her website just for a laugh

Or aren't you interested in the truth????

Not a clue what you're on about. Bridget is making them look like stubborn idiots. Mike Tesko, photographic expert   YOU ARE WRONG.

And now Rochford is being thick.     

This is beginning to feel like Stepford.     >@@(*&)
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #42 on: August 05, 2012, 10:01:38 AM »
And you are one to Judge????? 8-)(--)

jackiepreece

  • Guest
Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #43 on: August 05, 2012, 10:02:55 AM »
Try listening and reading you might learn something you didn't know about the case

Offline puglove

Re: Sheila and the wet blood theory
« Reply #44 on: August 05, 2012, 10:31:23 AM »
Enigma why doesn't Bridget go back to her Weety name instead of hiding behind a secret user name on here and making out she left after her row with Tim.

Bridget/Weety wouldn't know how to tell the truth if it was staring her in the face

If you don't believe me read her website just for a laugh

Or aren't you interested in the truth????

Not a clue what you're on about. Bridget is making them look like stubborn idiots. Mike Tesko, photographic expert   YOU ARE WRONG.

And now Rochford is being thick.     

This is beginning to feel like Stepford.     >@@(*&)

They haven't got a clue. Blind as bats. Jeremy will stay safe and sound, where he is     8((()*/
Jeremy Bamber kicked Mike Tesko in the fanny.