Author Topic: Strange Witness Statements  (Read 591516 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1545 on: June 28, 2015, 07:21:41 PM »
@Misty IMO there were several hundreds of residences searched and are not in the published files.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1546 on: June 29, 2015, 02:51:00 PM »
Were lots of residences visited twice in the very early days, or did the PJ target SM's building for special attention, including SR & KF's home?
They are different buildings Misty.

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1547 on: June 30, 2015, 11:47:24 AM »
Same shirt Eddie barked at?



Same shirt on the day? they received the church keys - Rocha Negra.

« Last Edit: June 30, 2015, 11:56:13 AM by pathfinder73 »
Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1548 on: June 30, 2015, 12:20:19 PM »
@pathfinder your lower photo is one of a set taken on Sat 5th
« Last Edit: June 30, 2015, 12:22:45 PM by pegasus »

Offline mercury

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1549 on: July 01, 2015, 12:24:51 AM »
Same shirt Eddie barked at?



I never noticed that from the dog video. I always assumed it was Kate Mccanns white top  (whichever one) which was one of the items Eddie alerted to, but on watching one of the videos have seen that sports top which is light blue and which both of them appear to have worn.
 (Belonged to GM)
I don't know how the PJ determined what clothes Eddie alerted to as he was disinterested in most but he certainly picked up that t shirt, not sure before or after barking or in between. Something there for him to bark at and he only barks when he has found what he is trained for. Cadaver odour. The police know,  one way or another, that's all that matters.


« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 12:28:25 AM by mercury »

Offline misty

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1550 on: July 01, 2015, 12:56:25 AM »
They are different buildings Misty.

My mistake. I took the newspaper article literally. Do you know offhand where Edifico Pedras Brancas is? Not to worry if you don't, as I don't believe it's important.
However I do wonder if the PJ returned to carry out a second check because one of the passports didn't check out according to the typewritten name.
We can only be reminded of how easily Ian Huntley beat the system......and the necessity to ensure all names are recorded & checked correctly.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1551 on: July 01, 2015, 01:39:54 AM »
It's a big white and blue building on Rua Escola Primeira Misty.
(Where some of the uk staff were accommodated).
« Last Edit: July 01, 2015, 01:43:53 AM by pegasus »

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1552 on: July 01, 2015, 02:24:37 AM »
It's a big white and blue building on Rua Escola Primeira Misty.
(Where some of the uk staff were accommodated).
How do we know UK staff were accommodated there?  Not challenging, I genuinely don't know the answer.  And clearly, we are back into Smithman.
What's up, old man?

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1553 on: July 03, 2015, 04:14:52 PM »
How do we know UK staff were accommodated there?  Not challenging, I genuinely don't know the answer.  And clearly, we are back into Smithman.
It's deduction ShiningInLuz from statements/location/colour etc that at least two apartments here (out of many dozens) were company-provided accom for some (not all) seasonal staff.

Offline ShiningInLuz

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1554 on: July 04, 2015, 12:38:29 AM »
Thank you.
What's up, old man?

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1555 on: July 04, 2015, 02:49:10 AM »

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1556 on: July 07, 2015, 12:39:56 PM »
Amsterdam 7 June

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline pegasus

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1557 on: July 07, 2015, 01:30:22 PM »
Amsterdam 7 June ....
Wasn't that the day after an interview in Berlin, and a near-diversion of a private jet to England?

Offline pathfinder73

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1558 on: July 07, 2015, 01:44:09 PM »
Wasn't that the day after an interview in Berlin, and a near-diversion of a private jet to England?

Berlin 6 June

Smithman carrying a child in his arms checked his watch after passing the Smith family and the time was 10:03. Both are still unidentified 10 years later.

Offline misty

Re: Strange Witness Statements
« Reply #1559 on: July 08, 2015, 02:31:46 AM »
http://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/CECILIA-DFC.htm
02_VOLUME_IIa_Page_278
 Revised translation.

Processos Volume II

Pages 277-278

Witness Statement


Cecilia Paula Dias Firmino do Carmo

Date/Time: 2007/05/06 22H00


Occupation: Public Relations

Place of Work: Millenium restaurant, OC.

She confirms that she is an employee of the OC, having signed a seven month contract in April this year. She worked in the resort last year, with the same functions and for the same period of time.

She says that her job is to receive guests at the entrance to the Millenium restaurant and check whether they have to pay for breakfast or whether this is included in their package. She works from 07.00 to 12.00 from Tuesdays to Saturdays. She says that she only attends to guests at breakfast time except on Wednesdays when there is Barbecue Night at the restaurant and when she welcomes guests for dinner, working from 18.00 to 22.00.

When asked, she says that due to her work she knows most of the guests given that most of them visit the Millenium as it is the only restaurant that serves breakfast.

When asked, she says that she knows the parents, the siblings and Madeleine. She received them for breakfast on Tuesday, Wednesday and Thursday, she does not know whether they went for breakfast on Sunday or Monday, as these were her days off.

She says that breakfast was served between 08.00 and 10.00 and that the McCanns would arrive between 08.00 and 09.00.

She says that the McCanns appeared to be a normal family and that the relation between the members of the family was very good. Madeleine appeared to be very attached to her father and was always clinging on to him. Given her public relations function she was always very nice to the guests and would get involved with the children, saying that Madeleine was very shy and did not respond to her. She says that the only contact she had with guests was at the entrance to the Millenium restaurant, she did not have a view of the tables or the Buffet area.

She heard about the disappearance on Friday morning 4th May from a colleague called Alice.

The resort is very calm, the witness only knows of a few minor thefts and is very surprised at the news. She has no information that could help locate Madeleine.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

A mistaken witness?