Strange Witness Statements

[mercury]

Ok,  I see what you are saying.

The thing is if this bit about David Payne didn't happen and they are just concocting a story,  then get the times right and what Kate was wearing etc.    Don't you think?

Anyway I wouldn't go by what David Payne said about times he couldn't work out how long it would have taken him or whether he called in before he got ready for tennis or afterwards,   he worked out it must have been before because otherwise he would have gone to the front door.    To me I don't think he is a very good judge about how long he stayed.

Also about whether he came in or not,  he said he took a couple of steps into the apartment,  which may still be called standing by the door.

As to what Kate was wearing,   he couldn't remember what the children were wearing either could he?   All white is what he remembers.

What I was saying was you were wrong, at least according to David Payne, that Kate McCann just mght have peeked out the bathroom door n her towel, according to him they had a conversation in the living room (even if she said he NEVER came in) and she says after he left she got dressed..so square this up

I've never said they with or without others concocted anything...the issue was about discrepancies....

[Brietta]

I'm not interested in your excuses.

Just simple logical reasons why it was done.

Then it might be a good idea for you to source information from what has gone before ... some of the posts on that thread were informative and you might have learned something.

You are really the strangest educationalist I have ever encountered ... and I have met some humdingers in my time.

[stephen25000]

Then it might be a good idea for you to source information from what has gone before ... some of the posts on that thread were informative and you might have learned something.

You are really the strangest educationalist I have ever encountered ... and I have met some humdingers in my time.

It's the small crowd you hang out with..


Try together out more. It would help.

[sadie]

What I was saying was you were wrong, at least according to David Payne, that Kate McCann just mght have peeked out the bathroom door n her towel, according to him they had a conversation in the living room (even if she said he NEVER came in) and she says after he left she got dressed..so square this up

I've never said they with or without others concocted anything...the issue was about discrepancies....

Well being open plan in parts, the lounge actually spread into the hallway and the area outside the bathroom which was between the childrens bedroom and the parents bedroom.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/notwtheflat.jpg



THe later area could well be called the lounge and if David had half a foot inside the patio door, they would have ben having a converstaion in the lounge..

Simples

[Brietta]

It's the small crowd you hang out with..


Try together out more. It would help.

LOL ... you really have no idea ... but perhaps you should try to get back to the topic of the thread ... Amaral and the dogs in case you have forgotten.

Wonder why you feel duty bound to derail every thread you post on.

See what you have done ... I've no idea whether I'm coming or going.

[stephen25000]

LOL ... you really have no idea ... but perhaps you should try to get back to the topic of the thread ... Amaral and the dogs in case you have forgotten.

Wonder why you feel duty bound to derail every thread you post on.

Try reading the thread title.   

Same o!d McCann supporter retort.

[Brietta]

Well being open plan in parts, the lounge actually spread into the hallway and the area outside the bathroom which was between the childrens bedroom and the parents bedroom.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/notwtheflat.jpg



THe later area could well be called the lounge and if David had half a foot inside the patio door, they would have ben having a converstaion in the lounge..

Simples

I looked through Mr Amaral's documentary earlier and I am sure the implication made was that the front door (carpark side) was used ... when it is quite clear it was the sliding door (pool side) which was used.

Very subtle ... but effective.

[Brietta]

Try reading the thread title.   

Same o!d McCann supporter retort.

Thank you ... I did.

Easy mistake to make since your posts are quite indistinguishable whatever the thread.

[stephen25000]

Thank you ... I did.

Easy mistake to make since your posts are quite indistinguishable whatever the thread.

Is that the best you can come up with ?   

[mercury]

Well being open plan in parts, the lounge actually spread into the hallway and the area outside the bathroom which was between the childrens bedroom and the parents bedroom.

http://www.mccannfiles.com/sitebuildercontent/sitebuilderpictures/notwtheflat.jpg



THe later area could well be called the lounge and if David had half a foot inside the patio door, they would have ben having a converstaion in the lounge..

Simples

What?? Have you lost the plot? It's a matter of did enter the apartment versus didn't enter.......
oh never mind.......

[G-Unit]

Try here ... I'm sure you may find enlightenment somewhere within ... and I am sure if you check even further back you will come across even more threads discussing exactly ... the same.

We do have the habit of returning to the same subject having lost the argument on all the other threads discussing it ... or is it just that posters are having difficulty with short term memory.

Deleted calls/texts and use of mobiles
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1267.0

The link is 2013. We weren't all here then you know. Also, it's about their own phones, not the new ones brought by the friend of David Payne's relatives.

[Lace]

What?? Have you lost the plot? It's a matter of did enter the apartment versus didn't enter.......
oh never mind.......

He entered a couple of steps into the apartment he said.

Do you or do you not agree that if this call in by David Payne didn't happen and they just made it all up,  then they would have got their stories matching?

It's all a load of nit picking if you ask me.

[Brietta]

The link is 2013. We weren't all here then you know. Also, it's about their own phones, not the new ones brought by the friend of David Payne's relatives.

Spot on ... I for one wasn't.
However you obviously failed to read further ... the last post being ... 6th June 2015. http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1267.msg245474#msg245474

[G-Unit]

Spot on ... I for one wasn't.
However you obviously failed to read further ... the last post being ... 6th June 2015. http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?topic=1267.msg245474#msg245474

I have no intention of reading a whole thread. If you wish to provide a link to information about the mobiles obtained by David Payne then do so.

[Brietta]

I have no intention of reading a whole thread. If you wish to provide a link to information about the mobiles obtained by David Payne then do so.

Not much point in anyone posting information relating to anything at all if you are unprepared and uninterested to read the thread containing it for information.
No wonder we are trapped in groundhog day ... doomed to constant repetition in one cycle after another.

Explains a lot.