I've heard that one before.
How do we know they ever existed ?
Raj Balu in his statement of May 2008. "I did not ask to see my original statements in order to refresh my memory. I confirm that these statements are correct."
This struck me as a bit weird, so I checked the Portuguese and the translation from Portuguese to English is good. I have no way of telling if the original translation from English to Portuguese was equally good.
He appears to be saying - more than one previous statement - which he has not seen this time around - but he confirms they are accurate. Whether that means the LP had hands on them or not, in English or not, is not something I can prove.
Raj Balu, May 2008, goes on to say. "After 22:00 we were still sitting on the veranda in the Berry apartment. We heard noises downstairs and afterwards found out that a child had disappeared. My testimony dated 6th of May 2007 related the details of the conversation we overheard and the information regarding the paper that Neil and I used in the searches."
So now there is a date for one of these statements - 6 May 2007. That's a fairly good memory re the date unless he's seen the date somewhere. He mentions nothing of meeting or talking to Gerry that evening, though a reliance is placed on previous statements being accurate, with nothing to add this time.
There's lots of reasons why material did not enter the PJ chain, and why chunks were not published when the files were released. There may or may not be something strange in this instance.
Again, I can't fathom how we work out the content of these missing statements, given that we can't read them.