Strange Witness Statements

[misty]

I know that Mark Warner gave all guests a letter telling them what had happened overnight. If they were planning to use just the Tapas crèche building it could have been in the letter. [I can make assumptions too]

Russell's statement was quite clear to me thank you.

I have no reason to disbelieve what innocent holidaymaker BOD wrote in her article as her family & others followed the normal routine. She did not mention a letter or being told to take children elsewhere for creche facilities.

[John]

A worthwhile exercise would be to try to determine from the crech lists which child Crecheman was carrying.

[misty]

A worthwhile exercise would be to try to determine from the crech lists which child Crecheman was carrying.

I don't think that would be fair to the father to name him on here. However, I don't believe he was Tannerman.

[Robittybob1]

I don't think that would be fair to the father to name him on here. However, I don't believe he was Tannerman.

  Have you done it?  Could it be done?

[misty]

  Have you done it?  Could it be done?

I couldn't possibly say.

[Robittybob1]

I couldn't possibly say.

So where did you start?

[mercury]

A worthwhile exercise would be to try to determine from the crech lists which child Crecheman was carrying.

2 year old daughter, cant be hard to figure out frm the arrivals list

[G-Unit]

There's one about the right age who attended Toddler 2 and was staying in Block 4. It could have been someone other than an MW guest, of course. I don't know if the night creche was exclusively MW, or if there was another TC or general one.

There was another Toddler 2 child at the night creche too, whose mother told the Nannies about Madeleine.

[pegasus]

If you use only the complete police files and the SY release it's actually not possible to id crecheman because (even after accounting for colour) there will always more than one candidate. Also there is a level of deliberate obfuscation in what SY released to make you not get it. However they are not perfect at it and it's possible to solve by being obsessively observant of the even the tiniest irrelevant details but nobody has got it. Anyway it's irrelevant because please note SY have already ruled this witness out.

[Robittybob1]

If you use only the complete police files and the SY release it's actually not possible to id crecheman because (even after accounting for colour) there will always more than one candidate. Also there is a level of deliberate obfuscation in what SY released to make you not get it. However they are not perfect at it and it's possible to solve by being obsessively observant of the even the tiniest irrelevant details but nobody has got it. Anyway it's irrelevant because please note SY have already ruled this witness out.

When did they rule this guy out?  Rule him out for what?  Ruled out for being Tannerman?

[pegasus]

When did they rule this guy out?  Rule him out for what?  Ruled out for being Tannerman?

Suggest you watch the Crimewatch Special Robbity as it is a useful method of learning what it contains
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OZ8jmdWlB8Y

[misty]

If you use only the complete police files and the SY release it's actually not possible to id crecheman because (even after accounting for colour) there will always more than one candidate. Also there is a level of deliberate obfuscation in what SY released to make you not get it. However they are not perfect at it and it's possible to solve by being obsessively observant of the even the tiniest irrelevant details but nobody has got it. Anyway it's irrelevant because please note SY have already ruled this witness out.

Are you saying I was wrong from the picture I found?

[pegasus]

Are you saying I was wrong from the picture I found?

If SY age info is correct there are 3 candidates at least, so just finding a picture of one or another is in itself not a solution Misty, something more would be needed.

[Robittybob1]

If SY age info is correct there are 3 candidates at least, so just finding a picture of one or another is in itself not a solution Misty, something more would be needed.

Do you know who Crecheman is Pegasus? 

[Robittybob1]

If you use only the complete police files and the SY release it's actually not possible to id crecheman because (even after accounting for colour) there will always more than one candidate. Also there is a level of deliberate obfuscation in what SY released to make you not get it. However they are not perfect at it and it's possible to solve by being obsessively observant of the even the tiniest irrelevant details but nobody has got it. Anyway it's irrelevant because please note SY have already ruled this witness out.

Could you tell me openly who you are referring to when you say SY have already ruled this witness out