I notice he picked up on Simon Foy's bizarre statement that 'they were where they were where they were when the child went missing'.
He also questions Rowley's assertion that the question of parental involvement was dealt with at the time by the Portuguese.
He seems to find these assertions as incomprehensible as many of us do, but he has the advantage of knowing how investigations normally proceed. In my opinion those who find nothing strange about the Met's pronouncenents are far too trusting.
Both Foy and Rowley know a lot more about the case, than Sutton.... So I prefer to take notice of what they say... IMO... Sutton wants his 15 mins of fame..
Has, Sutton commented on P D Carmos comments Re not suspects and no evidence. It isn't just what the police say that lead me to believe the mccanns are not involved... It's the whole picture.. .
Is Suttin making money out of talks on criminal cases... It looks like it... That explains to me why he's making somewhat controversial statements