Podcasts by Mark Saunokonoko of 9News.

[Venturi Swirl]

Keela's alerts, as Grime said, showed them where to look. She was correct because something was found, but the findings weren't all that helpful.

Keela’s alerts were correct because something was found??  Please explain your logic.

[Mr Gray]

Not according to Mark Saunokonoko.

That's your opinion... I think you are100% wrong

[G-Unit]

may be ...but the alerts are not corroborated...and Grime has is not on record as saying they are...in fact hes on record as saying they are not

I'm beginning to wonder if you understand what Grime means by corroberation. In my opinion all he's saying is that the alerts are corroberated if something is found where they alert. As there was no body Eddie's alerts couldn't be corroberated, but Keela's could and were.

In this case in particular, where the dogs alerted there was confirmation by positive results from the forensic examinations.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

[Venturi Swirl]

I'm beginning to wonder if you understand what Grime means by corroberation. In my opinion all he's saying is that the alerts are corroberated if something is found where they alert. As there was no body Eddie's alerts couldn't be corroberated, but Keela's could and were.

In this case in particular, where the dogs alerted there was confirmation by positive results from the forensic examinations.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

So in your opinion is Grime saying the dogs are always right?

[Eleanor]

Not according to Mark Saunokonoko.

What has Mark Saunokonoko got to do with anything?

[Robittybob1]

I'm beginning to wonder if you understand what Grime means by corroberation. In my opinion all he's saying is that the alerts are corroberated if something is found where they alert. As there was no body Eddie's alerts couldn't be corroberated, but Keela's could and were.

In this case in particular, where the dogs alerted there was confirmation by positive results from the forensic examinations.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

If that is Grimes' definition of corroboration I think we have to accept that.

[Robittybob1]

What has Mark Saunokonoko got to do with anything?

He's just another one bitten by the McCann bug.

[Robittybob1]

So in your opinion is Grime saying the dogs are always right?

Grime would have to say an alert was uncorroborated if no DNA was discovered at the site.

[Eleanor]

I'm beginning to wonder if you understand what Grime means by corroberation. In my opinion all he's saying is that the alerts are corroberated if something is found where they alert. As there was no body Eddie's alerts couldn't be corroberated, but Keela's could and were.

In this case in particular, where the dogs alerted there was confirmation by positive results from the forensic examinations.
https://www.mccannpjfiles.co.uk/PJ/MARTIN_GRIMES_RIGATORY.htm

Sadly, they didn't know what it was.

[G-Unit]

So in your opinion is Grime saying the dogs are always right?

No, that's not my opinion, and nothing I've written suggests that it is, imo. It seems to be a figment of your imagination, not mine.

[Mr Gray]

If that is Grimes' definition of corroboration I think we have to accept that.

That isn't Grimes definition..... Cite please

[G-Unit]

Sadly, they didn't know what it was.

Which is another matter altogether, nothing to do with Grime's role. He and his dogs are tasked with finding a particular type of evidence. Testing it and deciding what it means are jobs for others.

[Mr Gray]

If I say.... According to Martin grime the alerts ate suggestive  of cadaver odour and as no one else has died in tbe apartment then it suggests maddies death...


Can you see how Grimes statement combined with mine looks like grime has, said all if that


That's exactly what's happened with the podcast..

I'm 100% grime has not confirmed corroboration of the CSI alerts because he's ON RECORD as saying they are not yet confirmed... I gave the cite 2 weeks ago

[Eleanor]

Which is another matter altogether, nothing to do with Gtime's role. He and his dogs are tasked with finding a particular type of evidence. Testing it and deciding what it means are jobs for others.

Well, at least we seem to have got that far.  No Proof.

[carlymichelle]

Which is another matter altogether, nothing to do with Gtime's role. He and his dogs are tasked with finding a particular type of evidence. Testing it and deciding what it means are jobs for others.

i  think its awesome that someone here in  australia is so  honest  about the mcanns   im betting the mcanns and  their  followers   dont like   him