Oh, please!
What rag?
My summary is from the Guardain, from BBC crimewatch, from live interivew of DCI Redwood which you can find on youtube and todays live interview of SY's boss.
And if you think that you might know more about policing and investigation that DCI Redwood and than you are even in a position to criticise him then you my dead need a psychological treatment..
Where on earth did I criticise Andy?
I opined about his motivations.
Think of it...say in the framework of the OJ investigation.
Everyone thinks the fancy lawyers got in the way of the truth. OJ did it. He's now admitted it so it seems like a Miscarriage of Justice definitely occurred.
Now. Imagine if the LAPD announced they are reopening the investigation.
The lead investigator appears on morning tv to announce the reopening.
While he's on there, he says "well, I dont think it was OJ".
Before the investigation has even begun....!!!!!
Would you cry for him to be replaced as biased?
Would you think he has no right to voice an opinion before he has announced the results of the investigation?
Or would you sit there and say "well that's that, he's innocent cos the talking head told me so"?
Analytical thinking never goes astray.
What were AR's motives announcing his personal opinion on morning tv? Logically, it follows that the powers that be would proceed to wind up the funding and the investigation itself, as Andys already decided M is playing a tambourine on a Moroccan street corner.
The opposite has occured. The investigation is running fast now, in a particular direction, burglars notwithstanding.
The involvement of the CPS indicates a crime perpetrated by British Subjects in Portugal...not Portugese suspects, German, Morrocan, etc.
Andy's either a total dolt, a paid mouth, or he's being disingenous.
I personally think he's way smarter than he appears. I'm very happy with his tactics, especially when he blew Tannerman out of the water with the same mild half smile.