Why was Nevill Bamber in the kitchen?

[Venturi Swirl]

It's not up to anyone except a jury to pronounce guilt. That's how the law works.

What are you playing at then?

[Caroline]

It's not up to anyone except a jury to pronounce guilt. That's how the law works.

And they did and you're questioning the verdict!

[G-Unit]

And they did and you're questioning the verdict!

I was speaking of how the law operates. A jury can only judge on the evidence it's given.

[Venturi Swirl]

I was speaking of how the law operates. A jury can only judge on the evidence it's given.

Do you have more and better evidence than was presented to the juries?

[G-Unit]

Do you have more and better evidence than was presented to the juries?

I don't know yet. 

[Caroline]

I was speaking of how the law operates. A jury can only judge on the evidence it's given.

And they did and you're still questioning the verdict

[Caroline]

I don't know yet. 

So that's a big fat no then.

[G-Unit]

And they did and you're still questioning the verdict

I'm questioning the evidence not the verdict. The fact that Nevill Bamber was unable to speak, for example, doesn't mean he didn't phone his son because he could have done that before he was injured. The fact that a wetsuit was found doesn't mean it was worn. The fact that people thought Nevill Bamber was careful with his guns doesn't mean that he complied with the law, he didn't. Even if Jeremy Bamber knew he could put 11 cartridges in the gun that doesn't mean he did.

[Caroline]

I'm questioning the evidence not the verdict. The fact that Nevill Bamber was unable to speak, for example, doesn't mean he didn't phone his son because he could have done that before he was injured. The fact that a wetsuit was found doesn't mean it was worn. The fact that people thought Nevill Bamber was careful with his guns doesn't mean that he complied with the law, he didn't. Even if Jeremy Bamber knew he could put 11 cartridges in the gun that doesn't mean he did.

Nor does it indicate that any such call happened. The wetsuit didn't convict him. in fact I'm not sure it was even mentioned at trial. Only one gun formed part of the evidence and that's the one Bamber left out (or so he said). The 11 cartridges remains a possibility because he knew it could be done. I

[barrier]

I'm questioning the evidence not the verdict. The fact that Nevill Bamber was unable to speak, for example, doesn't mean he didn't phone his son because he could have done that before he was injured. The fact that a wetsuit was found doesn't mean it was worn. The fact that people thought Nevill Bamber was careful with his guns doesn't mean that he complied with the law, he didn't. Even if Jeremy Bamber knew he could put 11 cartridges in the gun that doesn't mean he did.

I can see where you're coming from on the evidence side,but a jury convicted on what they were shown and told.There's been two unsuccessful appeals another not getting past the ones who decide if it should go to the appeal court,This tells me that the powers to be are happy that the conviction is sound,any one who thinks otherwise needs to show that there is evidence not already disclosed to the relevant bodies.JBamber is a convicted child killer and should die in prison.

[adam]

I'm questioning the evidence not the verdict. The fact that Nevill Bamber was unable to speak, for example, doesn't mean he didn't phone his son because he could have done that before he was injured. The fact that a wetsuit was found doesn't mean it was worn. The fact that people thought Nevill Bamber was careful with his guns doesn't mean that he complied with the law, he didn't. Even if Jeremy Bamber knew he could put 11 cartridges in the gun that doesn't mean he did.

There are over 60 pieces of forensic evidence showing it was not Sheila. From an independent body - Court of Appeal.

[APRIL]

It's not up to anyone except a jury to pronounce guilt. That's how the law works.

So you'd accept without question, a not guilty verdict on the person you were convinced was responsible for robbing you of a family member?

[Venturi Swirl]

I don't know yet. 

Oh how very cryptic.  You ACT as if you do but as you’ve only had an interest in the case for a few weeks on the internet I very much doubt you know better than everyone else including the jury and judges that presided over Bamber’s appeals.

[Venturi Swirl]

I'm questioning the evidence not the verdict. The fact that Nevill Bamber was unable to speak, for example, doesn't mean he didn't phone his son because he could have done that before he was injured. The fact that a wetsuit was found doesn't mean it was worn. The fact that people thought Nevill Bamber was careful with his guns doesn't mean that he complied with the law, he didn't. Even if Jeremy Bamber knew he could put 11 cartridges in the gun that doesn't mean he did.

And even if there was no grease or gunpowder found on Sheila doesn’t mean she didn’t do it and just because human blood (probably hers) was found in the (hidden) silencer doesn’t mean it was used  in the killings, etc etc etc

[Holly Goodhead]

Oh how very cryptic.  You ACT as if you do but as you’ve only had an interest in the case for a few weeks on the internet I very much doubt you know better than everyone else including the jury and judges that presided over Bamber’s appeals.

Three words spring to mind: miscarriage of justice.  It does happen you know and of course until convictions are overturned the majority believe the conviction safe; if they didn't we wouldn't have long running miscarriages of justice.  It's the nature of the beast I'm afraid!