Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267256 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #225 on: October 27, 2013, 04:55:23 PM »
Tablets in the biblical sense, not the electronic....

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #226 on: October 27, 2013, 04:55:42 PM »
No denial from Clarence.

Have the McCanns known about the e-fits for years?  Yes or no?

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #227 on: October 27, 2013, 04:57:43 PM »
It's only ironic if the Sunday Times story is written on two tablets - and we don't know that yet.
What does this mean, please SH ? Like the 10 commandments ?

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #228 on: October 27, 2013, 04:59:38 PM »
No denial from Clarence.

Have the McCanns known about the e-fits for years?  Yes or no?
I have no idea where these e fits have been for 5 years but I would not believe that the McCanns would have hidden them..just my opinion

Offline Sherlock Holmes

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #229 on: October 27, 2013, 05:00:28 PM »
What does this mean, please SH ? Like the 10 commandments ?

I know it's a disturbing concept for the Nietzchean, but not all written sources are created equal.

If the Sunday Times is printing the truth in this story, we'll hear about it from other sources.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #230 on: October 27, 2013, 05:00:56 PM »
I cant see that something like this ..if true...will not be further discussed in the media..we should have some indication in the next few days

Some stories are told by only one newspaper, for years in some cases, before becoming mainstream. The Guardian and phone hacking, for one. Why do you think that is? It's not because they aren't true.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #231 on: October 27, 2013, 05:01:18 PM »
I have no idea where these e fits have been for 5 years but I would not believe that the McCanns would have hidden them..just my opinion
I don't believe that either. If they didn't like them, they could just destroy them.

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #232 on: October 27, 2013, 05:01:32 PM »
I have no idea where these e fits have been for 5 years but I would not believe that the McCanns would have hidden them..just my opinion

but did they know about them? They were obtained by their detectives.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #233 on: October 27, 2013, 05:03:40 PM »
but did they know about them? They were obtained by their detectives.

I would rather wait till we have more information

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #234 on: October 27, 2013, 05:03:57 PM »
I don't believe that either. If they didn't like them, they could just destroy them.

They would not have had the only copies.

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #235 on: October 27, 2013, 05:04:38 PM »
I don't believe that either. If they didn't like them, they could just destroy them.

No, Anne. That's what Richard Nixon did, and ever since people haven't been that stupid.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #236 on: October 27, 2013, 05:04:45 PM »
I don't believe that either. If they didn't like them, they could just destroy them.

They may have done Anne, SY had to get these from the authors of the report. If there were copies, they didn't destroy them all, hence the letter enforcing confidentiality.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #237 on: October 27, 2013, 05:05:09 PM »
I know it's a disturbing concept for the Nietzchean, but not all written sources are created equal.

If the Sunday Times is printing the truth in this story, we'll hear about it from other sources.
A disturbing concept for the Nietzschean ?
I was just asking the meaning of that expression and, as the 10 commandments were on two tablets, I thought it could be the origin of a current (?) idiomatic expression.

Offline Apostate

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #238 on: October 27, 2013, 05:05:34 PM »
I would rather wait till we have more information

I'm eagerly awaiting Clarence's denial. I've spent 5 years looking for bundleman and I'd hate to think I should have been looking for someone else.

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #239 on: October 27, 2013, 05:07:31 PM »
They may have done Anne, SY had to get these from the authors of the report. If there were copies, they didn't destroy them all, hence the letter enforcing confidentiality.
You're probably right and I'm very naive. But those e-fits seem to me so innocuous..