« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 96   Go Down

Author Topic: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.  (Read 267263 times)

0 Members and 5 Guests are viewing this topic.

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #765 on: October 31, 2013, 06:24:51 PM »
The article gave quotes from the fund, Clarence Mitchell was 'unavailable to comment' on it and yet appeared a couple of days later to say that Tractoreman was 'pure speculation'.

It seems so blindingly obvious to me that this story is true, that peoples refusal to accept it is bordering on a kind of religious ferver. It's a bit like people not believing in evolution.
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #766 on: October 31, 2013, 06:29:15 PM »
and it harmed the search?
Logged

Offline Benice

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #767 on: October 31, 2013, 06:30:36 PM »
Quote from: Apostate on October 31, 2013, 06:24:16 PM
it's true - deep down we all know it is

Speak for yourself - it's a newspaper article.   Enuff said as far as I'm concerned.
Logged
The notion that innocence prevails over guilt – when there is no evidence to the contrary – is what separates civilization from barbarism.    Unfortunately, there are remains of barbarism among us.    Until very recently, it headed the PJ in Portimão. I hope he was the last one.
                                               Henrique Monteiro, chief editor, Expresso, Portugal

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #768 on: October 31, 2013, 06:33:05 PM »
how better to deflect action against themselves than to promote and publicise another possible abductor?

But for some reason they didn't?

How strange?
Logged

icabodcrane

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #769 on: October 31, 2013, 06:35:53 PM »
Quote from: Cariad on October 31, 2013, 06:24:51 PM
The article gave quotes from the fund, Clarence Mitchell was 'unavailable to comment' on it and yet appeared a couple of days later to say that Tractoreman was 'pure speculation'.

It seems so blindingly obvious to me that this story is true, that peoples refusal to accept it is bordering on a kind of religious ferver. It's a bit like people not believing in evolution.

It is a bit like the Scopes Monkey Trial here at times 

The fact that Mitchell didn't want to put his name to any denial of the story was very telling,  I thought 
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #770 on: October 31, 2013, 06:46:24 PM »
posts are so revealing
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #771 on: October 31, 2013, 06:47:30 PM »
Quote from: Benice on October 31, 2013, 06:30:36 PM
Speak for yourself - it's a newspaper article.   Enuff said as far as I'm concerned.

the point is there is zero, nada, zilch, of anything of any kind to refute the contents....and never has been, by anybody....thats what you should be thinking about if you claim to be unbiased.....
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #772 on: October 31, 2013, 06:48:44 PM »
No proof, either.
Logged

Offline imustpointout

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #773 on: October 31, 2013, 06:49:47 PM »
Hitler Diaries
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #774 on: October 31, 2013, 06:50:05 PM »
Quote from: Jazzy on October 31, 2013, 06:48:44 PM
No proof, either.



No ones talking proof, what proof would be good for you here btw? Out of interest.......

Oh and well done to the Times Insight investigative group, thin on the ground these kind of people compared to the mawkish hideously cowardly sycophantic rest of them
« Last Edit: October 31, 2013, 06:55:18 PM by Redblossom »
Logged

AnneGuedes

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #775 on: October 31, 2013, 06:51:16 PM »
Quote from: icabodcrane on October 31, 2013, 06:35:53 PM
It is a bit like the Scopes Monkey Trial here at times 

That's seems incredible since 65 years earlier, in a famous debate on evolution in Oxford, the bishop Wilberforce asked T.H. Huxley, bulldog of Darwin and Aldous' grand father, if he descended from ape through his grand father or his grand mother. 
Logged

Offline Jazzy

Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #776 on: October 31, 2013, 06:53:10 PM »
Quote from: Redblossom on October 31, 2013, 06:50:05 PM
No ones talking proof, what proof would be good for you here btw? Out of interest.......

But you are always demanding proof.

Where's your proof, beyond a newspaper article that those efits were hidden?
Logged

Lyall

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #777 on: October 31, 2013, 06:54:52 PM »
Logged

Cariad

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #778 on: October 31, 2013, 06:55:38 PM »
Quote from: Jazzy on October 31, 2013, 06:53:10 PM
But you are always demanding proof.

Where's your proof, beyond a newspaper article that those efits were hidden?

They were not seen from 2008 till 2013.
Logged

Redblossom

  • Guest
Re: Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.
« Reply #779 on: October 31, 2013, 06:56:53 PM »
Quote from: Jazzy on October 31, 2013, 06:53:10 PM
But you are always demanding proof.

Where's your proof, beyond a newspaper article that those efits were hidden?

Nope you have a bad memory is all...normally ask for some kind of back up/evidence..any..ehen some just spout stuff out and thrn some refuse to back it up, so tedious....off to watch some paint dry, more interesting, at least you see a result,  bbl though
 8((()*/

« Last Edit: October 31, 2013, 06:59:45 PM by Redblossom »
Logged
Pages: 1 ... 50 51 [52] 53 54 ... 96   Go Up
« previous next »