Sunday Times claim that Smith e-fits had been suppressed for 5 years.

[Mr Gray]

Why would the McCanns supress information that might help find maddie

[stephen25000]

Why would the McCanns supress information that might help find maddie

Didn't you read the Times article ?

The impression was it would reflect badly on the Mccanns.

It could also imply they knew the Smith sighting was irrelevant, unless you count of course the 60-80% probability.

[Mr Gray]

Didn't you read the Times article ?

The impression was it would reflect badly on the Mccanns.

It could also imply they knew the Smith sighting was irrelevant, unless you count of course the 60-80% probability.

yes read the times article...didn't think much of it...I still cant see what information they found that could have helped find maddie

[Apostate]

Why would the McCanns supress information that might help find maddie

they wouldn't if their search was sincere

[stephen25000]

yes read the times article...didn't think much of it...I still cant see what information they found that could have helped find maddie

So you think the Smith sighting is irrelevant ?

[Aiofe]

It is a bit like the Scopes Monkey Trial here at times 

The fact that Mitchell didn't want to put his name to any denial of the story was very telling,  I thought

How is it like the Scopes trial?

[Aiofe]

They were not seen from 2008 till 2013.

By whom were they not seen. We do not know with whom they were shared.

[Apostate]

By whom were they not seen. We do not know with whom they were shared.

virtually the entire population of the world

[Mr Gray]

So you think the Smith sighting is irrelevant ?

According to the telegraph article the efits were handed to the PJ and SY... I am referring to their reports..also is there any proof for this statement...

They were led by Henri Exton, MI5’s former undercover operations chief.

How could exton not realise that halligan was a fraud?  None of it makes sense

[Wonderfulspam]

According to the telegraph article the efits were handed to the PJ and SY... I am referring to their reports..also is there any proof for this statement...

They were led by Henri Exton, MI5’s former undercover operations chief.

How could exton not realise that halligan was a fraud?  None of it makes sense

None of it makes sense


Not too dissimilar to the McCanns account of 3rd May 2007 then.

[Mr Gray]

None of it makes sense


Not too dissimilar to the McCanns account of 3rd May 2007 then.

Good to see you agree

[stephen25000]

None of it makes sense


Not too dissimilar to the McCanns account of 3rd May 2007 then.

By the same token, why didn't the Mccanns know he was a fraud ?

After all, surely they checked people out before hiring them ?

[Mr Gray]

By the same token, why didn't the Mccanns know he was a fraud ?

After all, surely they checked people out before hiring them ?

I think you will find it was kennedy who hired them and Gerry who decided they were no good...halligan was a consummate conman who claimed to have worked for MI5...if exton had worked for MI5 surely you would expect him to suspect halligan  immediately..its his job, supposedly

[stephen25000]

I think you will find it was kennedy who hired them and Gerry who decided they were no good...halligan was a consummate conman who claimed to have worked for MI5...if exton had worked for MI5 surely you would expect him to suspect halligan  immediately..its his job, supposedly

Was this the same Kennedy who visited the Smith famioly and had no business doing so ?

As to Exton, what information did he have access to ?

[Mr Gray]

Was this the same Kennedy who visited the Smith famioly and had no business doing so ?

As to Exton, what information did he have access to ?

Exton ..we a re told..was head of Oakley, as was halligen   so they must have met and discussed ..

Kannedy can visit who he likes.....its none of your business