Author Topic: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?  (Read 136990 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #780 on: August 29, 2018, 10:00:17 AM »
I think many treated her as an anachronistic joke.
You don’t say!
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #781 on: August 29, 2018, 10:02:39 AM »
Mary Whitehouse was a person guided by her strong moral beliefs and religious principles.  Do you believe she was a malign influence on British society?  The dossier compilers seem to be considered malign by some on here, were they in your view?

Mary Whitehouse and the dossier compiler's both disapproved of certain things. Not only did they disapprove they wanted everyone else to comply with their opinions. They had every right to have opinions, but no right to insist that there opinions should dominate.

Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #782 on: August 29, 2018, 10:06:17 AM »
Mary Whitehouse and the dossier compiler's both disapproved of certain things. Not only did they disapprove they wanted everyone else to comply with their opinions. They had every right to have opinions, but no right to insist that there opinions should dominate.
Can you provideva link to the dossier compilers insistence that their opinions should dominate?  Was Whitehouse wrong to insist that “kiddie porn” was wrong?  Was Jayne Senior wrong to go to the Times when she thought it wrong that Asian gangs were grooming underage girls and the police turned a blind eye? Rhetorical, my questions are far too difficult  to give an honest answer to, I know.
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #783 on: August 29, 2018, 10:11:12 AM »
I think many treated her as an anachronistic joke.

She certainly didn't share the mood of the 1960's.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #784 on: August 29, 2018, 10:12:48 AM »
She certainly didn't share the mood of the 1960's.
Was she a bad person?
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #785 on: August 29, 2018, 10:35:21 AM »
Can you provideva link to the dossier compilers insistence that their opinions should dominate?  Was Whitehouse wrong to insist that “kiddie porn” was wrong?  Was Jayne Senior wrong to go to the Times when she thought it wrong that Asian gangs were grooming underage girls and the police turned a blind eye? Rhetorical, my questions are far too difficult  to give an honest answer to, I know.

Jayne Senior isn't the same because she exposed actual crimes.
Mary Whitehouse wanted censorship of the media and the BBC.
The dossier compilers wanted people to be prosecuted for what they thought were crimes;

Brunt said those who compiled the dossier have reacted with "absolute dismay" at the decision not to prosecute.

"They say it is tantamount to giving the trolls, as they call them, carte blanche to carry on abusing the McCanns," he said.
https://news.sky.com/story/mccann-trolls-police-wont-take-action-10361261



Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline jassi

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #786 on: August 29, 2018, 10:39:31 AM »
Was she a bad person?

 Merely a subjective decision based on an individual's  outlook.

I would consider her misguided rather than bad.
I believe everything. And l believe nothing.
I suspect everyone. And l suspect no one.
I gather the facts, examine the clues... and before   you know it, the case is solved!"

Or maybe not -

OG have been pushed out by the Germans who have reserved all the deck chairs for the foreseeable future

Offline Erngath

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #787 on: August 29, 2018, 10:48:13 AM »
Merely a subjective decision based on an individual's  outlook.

I would consider her misguided rather than bad.

I'm finding this deflection from  pertinent questions asked to a Mary Whitehouse discussion, very cleverly done.
Deal with the failings of others as gently as with your own.

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #788 on: August 29, 2018, 10:56:06 AM »
I'm finding this deflection from  pertinent questions asked to a Mary Whitehouse discussion, very cleverly done.

Maybe such a high profile case will bring about a clarification  of the law... Brenda felt what she, was doing was perfectly acceptable.   It is if you accept victims of online abuse committing suicide... It isn't if you dont

Offline G-Unit

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #789 on: August 29, 2018, 10:56:40 AM »
Was she a bad person?

What on earth has that got to do with it? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I will always oppose anyone who seeks to stop others saying, reading or watching something just because they disapprove of it.
Read and abide by the forum rules.
Result = happy posting.
Ignore and break the rules
Result = edits, deletions and unhappiness
http://miscarriageofjustice.co/index.php?board=2.0

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #790 on: August 29, 2018, 10:58:44 AM »
Jayne Senior isn't the same because she exposed actual crimes.
Mary Whitehouse wanted censorship of the media and the BBC.
The dossier compilers wanted people to be prosecuted for what they thought were crimes;

Brunt said those who compiled the dossier have reacted with "absolute dismay" at the decision not to prosecute.

"They say it is tantamount to giving the trolls, as they call them, carte blanche to carry on abusing the McCanns," he said.
https://news.sky.com/story/mccann-trolls-police-wont-take-action-10361261
Jayne Senior IS IMO the same because until she went to the Times, the police were not interested in investigating these crimes.  In other words, they weren't crimes as far as the police were concerned UNTIL the media shone a light on their complacency about child sex grooming.  As far as she or the Times knew at the time of blowing the whistle, the police could still have come back with a decision not to prosecute.  The only difference is that in the case of the malign tweets being made about the McCanns and accusing them, of among other things, being murderers, the police decided not to go ahead with any prosecutions.   The dossier compilers have every right to be dismayed at what they perceived to be police complacency, that doesn't mean they insisted on anything. 
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #791 on: August 29, 2018, 10:59:36 AM »
What on earth has that got to do with it? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I will always oppose anyone who seeks to stop others saying, reading or watching something just because they disapprove of it.
Does that include looking at child pornography, which thanks in large part to Mary Whitehouse is now an illegal activity?  Did Mary Whitehouse pave the road to hell in your view?
« Last Edit: August 29, 2018, 11:01:49 AM by Vertigo Swirl »
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #792 on: August 29, 2018, 11:00:20 AM »
What on earth has that got to do with it? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I will always oppose anyone who seeks to stop others saying, reading or watching something just because they disapprove of it.
The law does exactly that... But sets limits. So you oppose the law

Offline Mr Gray

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #793 on: August 29, 2018, 11:03:06 AM »
What on earth has that got to do with it? The road to hell is paved with good intentions. I will always oppose anyone who seeks to stop others saying, reading or watching something just because they disapprove of it.

And I will always, support an individuals right to appeal to the press to expose something they see, as, an injustice

Offline Venturi Swirl

Re: Did Brenda Leyland Have the Right to Due Process ?
« Reply #794 on: August 29, 2018, 11:05:27 AM »
And I will always, support an individuals right to appeal to the press to expose something they see, as, an injustice
#metoo
"Surely the fact that their accounts were different reinforces their veracity rather than diminishes it? If they had colluded in protecting ........ surely all of their accounts would be the same?" - Faithlilly