Nine have you ever looked it from the view point of Tabak being guilty and working your way back? everyone on this forum comments on cases where they have been found guilty. Some say that is enough to convince them that right verdict was reached others totally disagree.
Tabak offered up a version of what he said happened... that could be true or maybe a watered down version to give the best impression of himself and the attack that took place that evening
If you were guilty yourself and looked at your future being spend serving a life sentence, what version of yourself would you put forward?
Stupidly I would be honest and say exactly what happened... But that is me... I would expect to be represented properly too...
I can work backwards on this , but it still makes no sense..... I can work upside down on this and it won't make any difference....
I have wasted my time... I thought there was a point to the Justice System... But not the point I originally believed...
I won't change my mind until someone proves to me that Dr Vincent Tabak did indeed kill Joanna yeates.... I won't change my mind until DS Mark Saunders CCTV tape of Canygne Road on the 17th December 2010 is seen by the public, to prove one way or another whether or not Joanna Yeates actually arrived home.... Because Colin Port shouldn't be telling The Leveson Inquiry that the last known sighting of Joanna Yeates was at the Hophouse pub...
Meaning Joanna yeates either got home and is on the CCTV that DS Mark Saunders speaks of... Or there is CCTV footage of a time at the HopHouse pub we know nothing about... Because that clip we have seen of Joanna yeates at the end of the street on the HopHouse Pub footage, doesn't clearly indicate who the person is on that footage.... So there has to be more footage, for Colin Pot to say that Joanna Yeates was last seen on the CCTV from the Hophouse pub.... And we are aware that they Police took the entire system away from The Hophouse Pub... Why do that if there wasn't anything else on the footage from that establishment...
So yes.. I will question the events at trial..... because they make no sense either!