Joanna Yeates Flat entrance... https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/picturegalleries/uknews/8822613/Inside-the-flat-where-Joanna-Yeates-was-killed-by-Vincent-Tabak.html
Enlarged view of the entrance contraption / intercom / doorbell, similar to that outside Tabak's flat. Perhaps the cover / grill has been removed by police for forensic analysis of fingerprints, saliva DNA, etc.
Well myster... funny you should show that image again.....
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/police-investigation-continues-flat-door-removed-people-news-footage/685650778That footage is dated 29th December 2010.... The Intercom from the Flat we know as Joanna Yeates Flat.. Flat 1.. Is having the intercom removed...
Now I have said before that even though these clips are dated on Getty doesn't mean that they were not filmed before.... Getty may have been given them on one date and uploaded them on another date...
So.... It is entirely possible, for the intercom to have been removed before... And then put on the flat at the back... That's why the flat at the back has the image of the Intercom saying Flat 1...
To me everything is staged.... But I do not know the purpose...
The date of the builders putting up the scaffolding doesn't have to be the 22nd January 2011 either... all this could have been done at any time...
To be honest I do not know who to believe anymore... We have people on video contradicting themselves.. we have images of the back of Canygne Road before Dr Vincent Tabak is a suspect...
For some reason the whole incident, has got the media involved... and I don't think it's as simple as her being Murdered... If that was the case...
The amount of footage is considerable.. even though certain articles and forum/groups have been removed.....
It's either some elaborate media exercise or they are very well aware who killed Joanna Yeates and they can't touch them for it...
Everything appears to be pre-recorded... The Police Conferences, the media footage, the documentaries... everything... Now Avon and Somerset Police have there own media centre.... Did they do all the recording then distribute it to news outlets??
Is that why the Police got upset with ITV... they did a piece to camera they didn't have permission for??
No media group should have that closer access to a potential crime scene.... To get around the back of the building, to walk on the pavement.... To get up close and personal with that door...
there are a couple of ideas, that I was thinking..... Dr Vincent Tabak has moved out of the premises literally by the 23rd December 2010, he has gone to Cambridge then on to Holland coming back on the 2nd January 2011 and then moving to Aberdeen Road...
This then has me wondering... when in fact did Dr Vincent Tabak mention about the Forensics on the door?? It's like you have knowledge, make a statement then they arrest you....
Did Dr Vincent Tabak see them removing Joanna Yeates door before he left for Cambridge?? As with CJ seeing people at the gate.... He reports that and within no time he is arrested...
The only difference with Dr Vincent Tabak is it took a while to arrest him... But Ann did say it was a planned arrest...
If I decide that Dr Vincent Tabak saw the removal of the door before he left bristol... then do I also assume that... "That Phone Call" was in fact Dr Vincent Tabak, and he was mentioning about seeing them remove the door and thought it quite strange?? (given you the answer of "He was over interested in forensics")
I am not saying that is the case, but a scenario....
It is strange that there is no crystal clear images of the intercom of Dr Vincent Tabak... The media not zooming in on this detail... The Media, then not being clear on the matters in hand....
The media either colluded or were fooled themselves.... by person or persons unknown....
I'm hoping that there is still some integrity in the media and go with that they were supplied with the images of the close ups of the building down the side and across the back....
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/joanna-yeates-murder-trial-defendant-vincent-tabak-gives-news-footage/656385638The link above shows Joanna Yeates door, with a bunch of keys ,mortice keys that would and possibly could fit the glass panelled door....
Going back to the Media?? Who is the media?? CJ was arrested and taken from his home without any of the major news outlets noticing, yet the media were apparently parked outside 24/7... So was it the Polices media??
Thinking about it... why would the media be allowed to walk around Joanna Yeates Flat when the trial is taking place... I believe that footage was released to the media...
This Clip... taken in December when Joanna yeates is Missing...
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/vincent-tabak-trial-date-unknown-snow-on-ground-outside-news-footage/656487136Now the media shouldn't have access to a crime scene,... I have said before.. they shouldn't be walking on potential evidence... But I don't think it is the News media.... Is it A&S own media??
I do not believe that the news media have the original footage...
The footage of The Yeates arriving at The Old Bailey... know one knew until the last minutes that the court venue had been changed, but we have The Yeates walking down the pavement with Emma the FLO officer....
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/vincent-tabak-faces-murder-trial-england-london-ext-news-footage/656058150Again is this A&S's own footage??
This Clip
https://www.gettyimages.co.uk/detail/video/vincent-tabak-trial-continues-bristol-crown-court-rebecca-news-footage/656136396Rebecca Scott arriving at court... She a witness being identified before she has taken the stand.... The media I believe are not allowed to identify witness's.... well I don't believe they did... It's the same people who have made virtually every piece of media about this case....
Two cat trays... always bugged me... But if that is one basement flat then the other tray would be need near the other door....
Back to the tour video... Were there 2 video's made and the media chose which one they used... That would explain the trainers being moved and the clock being 5 minutes difference in time in some images....
Is this the reason that all the footage is just clips...??
I get the feeling thats why the images and clips are so strange... The media knew what was happening and how they were being manipulated... It's a possibility... The identity of some of the officers are covered by their caps... But now I have a thought.....
So there are the official clips that have been distributed to the media... Then there is the medias own clips.....
This is why I have Tim Roth in the middle of an image dressed as a Police Officer... The media were trying to point out what the Police were doing in an odd way... I kept seeing people whom i thought I recognised.... And couldn't understand what was going on....
We have the images that have sent me around the twist... unprecedented footage of a crime scene or scenes.... we have footage of The Yeates walking around a Crime Scene.... when the 2nd Scene of Crime hasn't finished being processed....
You wouldn't get that .. it shouldn't be allowed.... The Funeral... there was supposed to have been 300 people attend yet we see very few people... no crowds crying at the funeral nothing... That too must be from the original source and not the news media.... (imo)
I couldn't understand why I recognised people whom I believed had been on TV before, yet they were slap bang in the middle of a crime scene....!!
Now I think I understand... You have 'The Original Source".. who may be the Police I don't know.... and the rest of the media, whom have some different images... I believe it is the rest of the media whom are trying to discredit the "The Original Source"... by introducing many red herrings in the form of Tim Roth, for instance....
We have Emma the FLO telling us about what Greg has said about Innocent men before CJ was released... Now if the media know that this is all orchestrated, then I believe they released the footage before it was meant to be released.... The Police must have sent it too them before CJ's release...
The Police controlled the medias access to this case... they controlled everything....
Is this why BDP release the information that Joanna Yeates was found on the 24th December 2010, when the official date was the 25th December 2010... The too were not going to be manipulated...
Come to think of it... some of the media had already stated on the 26th December that Joanna Yeates had been strangled, if my memory serves me correctly.... But those articles have been removed...
I've had my self in knots, not understanding why the media do not say anything... and why the story is always rehashed...
But if the Polices own the footage, then the media may have only had a license to use it for so long.... It's the same media, over and over again.... nothing differs... The CCTV footage never changes... no different angles....no Dr Vincent Tabak at the till paying for his goods....
If the only footage is the original footage that was distributed amongst the media... the media will have an issue reusing it possibly...
Now... Longwood Lane.... we have the fire service there over 4 days, we have men with rope access gear shown on the 27th December 2010... Now as I stated that footage could have been taken before... The media just published it on that date.... Why are they going to be parked at the bottom of Longwood Lane when nothing is happening and the police wouldn't want them accidentally taking footage of something they may not want them to see??
I believe they were given the footage .. I think the medias footage would have been taken from the bottom of providence lane I think its called... at the cross roads of Longwood lane...
So are the news media playing the police at there own game.... ?? Who was the original source of the footage??
Still doesn't answer who killed Joanna Yeates... But I can keep questioning that in my mind... is she really dead??
Was there really a crime?? I don't know... apologises if there was... But something is mighty fishy about this case....
Come to think of it the media centre at A&S hasn't it got something to do with Southwest One ??..
Are they the original source?? Is that why the Police keep the video's of Joanna Yeates CCTV clips etc on their youtube site... It's a possibility....
So who is the original source??
Is this the reason The Yeates keep making documentaries... which contradict each others statements to shed light on what happened with the media footage?? ... Or have they forgotten what they have said previously????
I don't know....
But if Joanna Yeates was Murdered, If Dr Vincent Tabak is in prison... then The Yeates footage is to highlight something that they cannot speak of.... The real killer either cannot be prosecuted or has been protected... (imo)
Either that or this is some strange, publicity stunt! but I can't say....
Edit... Did a trial really take place... Or is that the media again highlighting this case in there own way??