Some reports say it was Tanja who made the call from Holland. Not really certain who made it.
If it is true that VT helped CJ move his car on the Saturday morning, and that CJ parked his car on the road at 9pm on the Friday night( as he says he did), then, at some point CJ did move his car. So what if he did? In fact, as far as I know, he has never denied doing so. Why on earth should this be taken as an example of VT implicating CJ??
This is what was reported mrswah
At this point Tabak made a huge mistake. Spotting a chance to frame Jefferies, he contacted Avon and Somerset police and suggested the landlord had been out and about in his car on the night of Yeates's death. The murder team sent DC Karen Thomas to Amsterdam and on New Year's Eve she spoke to Tabak at a hotel near Schiphol airport for six hours.
For the first time, Tabak's behaviour seemed suspicious. He talked to her about Jefferies but seemed, in Thomas's words, "overly interested" in the forensic examinations police were carrying out. Tabak also gave Thomas a different version of what he had done on the night of Yeates's disappearance, explaining that he had gone out twice, once to take photographs of the snow and the second time to go to Asda.
TABAKS STATEMENTS DIDNT MATCH UP
Tabak’s first statement didn’t match his second, which always draws suspicion, they asked him why it didn’t match and he said his first statement was about Christopher Jefferies and why he could have killed Joanna Yeates?
He said he went to help Mr Jefferies move his car in the morning between 8.30am and 9.00am mr Jefferies had come to his door to ask him for help, because the car was settled in snow, they asked Tabak which way was the car facing, he replied in toward the house, Thus meaning it wasn’t in the same position as the night before because he had said it was facing out the night before, meaning mr Jefferies had been out.
When they questioned Mr Jefferies on this, he replied why would he say that, “it was facing out which is why he was able push from the back and I was able to drive straight out”
So the implications, it was clear Tabak wasn’t telling the truth, he made a point about it being facing in towards the house, to try and say it had been moved, it would have been a lot harder for one person to push mr Jefferies car and do the turn needed in Snow to get mr Jefferies out, especially for one person something you would never forget, don’t forget Mr Jefferies was finding it hard to even manoeuvre his car forward never mind doing a 10 point turn in the drive and then drive off, picture in your head a car facing towards the house, then picture someone pushing you in snow to turn you around on the drive.
Wether you like it or not, police are trained to spot these discrepancies in statements, it was a big big outright lie to try and implicate mr Jefferies.
With this tip off from Tabak, this then led to Mr Jefferies car being took away for analysis, nothing was ever found and Mr Jefferies was later released.
