The Defence Will State Their Case

[APRIL]

Case maybe solved but is the right culprit in prison?

The point I am trying to make about what I interpret, is.... If I myself am not a professional in any sense of the word, can look at this case and question so many aspects, then why didn't all these aspects get investigated fully in the first place?

I am not interested in what a profiler has to say, to be honest, that is their opinion based on what? 
Their interpretation..

As a profiler in a case where social media is massively important, then the profiler has to have a complete understanding of said social media, not just that, an understanding of what said texts may mean, and an understand of quirks that may apply to people of different Nationalities... In my opinion of course..

I notice that there's some deflection going on here. Tabak's interest in violent pornography, especially and particularly that which involves children, CANNOT be side-stepped, yet not once have you made any mention of it, let alone condemned it. I can't help but wonder why. Incidentally, a profiler's job isn't to understand the media. Their only job is to explore the mind of a potential perpetrator and their actions.

[[...]]

Well most posters wasn’t here then NB, so you bought a name up from the past and expect others not to comment, you call yourself the most outrageous names and expect sympathy, you make the most outrageous comments and expect posters to fall in line and not question, NOT ON THIS WATCH IM AFRAID

I was trying to put into context why I had made a certain post..

[[...]]

You have no idea what I am talking about ... its you who is doing the talking about something you say is nothing to do with you

a bit like the Tabak case???

Fair point... It is nothing to do with me..

But... Dean Armstrong on his radio interview liked the comments and reactions of the public and their interest in this case....

[jixy]

Fair point... It is nothing to do with me..

But... Dean Armstrong on his radio interview liked the comments and reactions of the public and their interest in this case....

I feel like a game of snap coming on

[[...]]

I feel like a game of snap coming on

You play cards Jixy?

[jixy]

No not cards but its a great game 

[mrswah]

I notice that there's some deflection going on here. Tabak's interest in violent pornography, especially and particularly that which involves children, CANNOT be side-stepped, yet not once have you made any mention of it, let alone condemned it. I can't help but wonder why. Incidentally, a profiler's job isn't to understand the media. Their only job is to explore the mind of a potential perpetrator and their actions.

I haven't concentrated on the porn much, merely because the thread is about the murder of Joanna Yeates. The porn played no part in the murder trial.

[jixy]

I haven't concentrated on the porn much, merely because the thread is about the murder of Joanna Yeates. The porn played no part in the murder trial.

I think that was to NB! didnt play a part in the murder? its part of who is he and how he behaves and views women and children. I would say that makes it VERY important

[[...]]

I notice that there's some deflection going on here. Tabak's interest in violent pornography, especially and particularly that which involves children, CANNOT be side-stepped, yet not once have you made any mention of it, let alone condemned it. I can't help but wonder why. Incidentally, a profiler's job isn't to understand the media. Their only job is to explore the mind of a potential perpetrator and their actions.

The thought of anyone abusing children I find abhorrent, that in turn has made this a difficult case to tackle.. But my primary motive was I never believed that Dr Vincent Tabak killed Joanna Yeates, and that case of Joanna yeates is a separate issue, to the images...

[[...]]

No not cards but its a great game 

Well as long as you're enjoying it Jixy...

[jixy]

Well as long as you're enjoying it Jixy...

Oh i really would thanks NB not as much as Tabak did looking at the pics that you have ALWAYS played down and at times denied he had viewed them. That too was someone else !

[[...]]

Oh i really would thanks NB not as much as Tabak did looking at the pics that you have ALWAYS played down and at times denied he had viewed them. That too was someone else !

Yes I did deny about the images... I found bringing him to court years and years later after he is already serving a sentence for Joanna Yeates Murder didn't make sense... They had the images apparently in the beginning, if this was the case, why did it take so many years to bring him to court over these images... That they already were aware of, images that the amount appeared to increase once Dr Vincent Tabak was in prison....

That's why I questioned the validity of the images and the plea once again of 'Guilt"!

[jixy]

but he is guilty so all pretty pointless!

[mrswah]

I think that was to NB! didnt play a part in the murder? its part of who is he and how he behaves and views women and children. I would say that makes it VERY important

Sure, but it still didn't play a part in the murder trial!

[jixy]

Sure, but it still didn't play a part in the murder trial!

Another point that you dont actually know! who knows what was running through his head when he took a life. He did it for a reason and only Tabak knows that reason!

He was never gonna explain that in court because it all just happened apparently. That is what he wanted the court to believe in his attempt to get convicted of Manslaughter.

You cannot second guess someone who likes to look at filth like that even more so when you dont know them or their real personality!