The Defence Will State Their Case

[Real justice]

And of course Tabak hasn't denied viewing the images 

Im afraid confessions don’t count Caroline  . It’s time we did away with confessions, when someone admits to a crime, just send them away, GO HOME WE DON’T  BELIEVE YOU

[Caroline]

Im afraid confessions don’t count Caroline  . It’s time we did away with confessions, when someone admits to a crime, just send them away, GO HOME WE DON’T  BELIEVE YOU

 

[APRIL]

Im afraid confessions don’t count Caroline  . It’s time we did away with confessions, when someone admits to a crime, just send them away, GO HOME WE DON’T  BELIEVE YOU

And if we add to their number all those who, whilst taking advantage of Her Majesty's hospitality, claim innocence, we can empty our prisons. Still, it'll stop complaints about how dreadful are the conditions in them. Funny, isn't it? They have a roof over their heads, food in their bellies, don't have to travel miles to a job, and they're STILL not grateful.

[Caroline]

I'm interested in the Joanna Yeates case... And what happened there...

Also refer back to mrswah's post you quoted...

No-one is defending the abuse of children..

Not long ago, viewing such images was described as just looking at pictures! Mentioned at trial or not, the FACT that Tabak had a perversion for violent porn is very much part of this case - no matter how many attemps are made to play it down!

[Caroline]

Therefore the qualifications of said expert should have been taken into account, and on saying that was it the same expert whom looked at Dr Vincent Tabak's computer searches that were used in the trial of the Joanna Yeates case?

Or has there been a myriad of people having access to the computer of Dr Vincent Tabak, in their specialist subject?

Said computer analyst should have attended the trial in October 2011, to give their analysis of this computer, but I do not believe this took place...

This is why there should be proper protocol of the handling of electronic devices etc, used in any trial....

There is no evidence that that wasn't the case! It's simply a suggestion bandied about here!

[Caroline]

So, if someone living in my street is killed tonight, and I say I'm guilty, I'm automatically going to be believed, am I??? Nobody is going to check and discover that it cant possibly have been me, because I wasn't in the neighbourhood at the crucial time? Doesn't seem a very satisfactory way of doing things------

No, you would be investigated - just as Tabak was!

[Caroline]

Yes, exactly, we were told by the news and papers. Can we always believe what we read in the papers? Remember what the papers told us about CJ, for starters!!

So, you honestly believe that VT killed Joanna because her top was the same colour as that of the woman in his porn video? Don't you think Tanja ever wore a pink top? Do you think none of VTs colleagues did?

Who would you prefer to hear the news from? No we can't always believe what we read in the papers but in instances where lying would have no value  - then yes, we can. Tabak was sentenced for viewing such images - I think you know that to be true.

[Real justice]

 

Reminds me a bit like one of my favourite clips, WHAT HAVE THE ROMANS EVER DONE FOR US. Monty python, then apply it to denial of Tabak supporters and what evidence do the police have, confession, DNA, blood, fibres, cctv  .

[Real justice]

Yes, exactly, we were told by the news and papers. Can we always believe what we read in the papers? Remember what the papers told us about CJ, for starters!!

So, you honestly believe that VT killed Joanna because her top was the same colour as that of the woman in his porn video? Don't you think Tanja ever wore a pink top? Do you think none of VTs colleagues did?

Horrible what they did to CJ, they got punished heavily for this and rightly so.  Don’t think Tabak received any compensation for reporting untruths?

[mrswah]

Who would you prefer to hear the news from? No we can't always believe what we read in the papers but in instances where lying would have no value  - then yes, we can. Tabak was sentenced for viewing such images - I think you know that to be true.

Yes, of course I know it to be true. I'm not at all sure about the prostitutes though. There were differing reports.

[jixy]

mrswah you do keep changing your mind. its hard to keep up!

[mrswah]

mrswah you do keep changing your mind. its hard to keep up!

I have never denied that VT was convicted of both the murder of Joanna and the possession of indecent images of children. However, you are right that I keep changing my mind about VT in  general. It's what discussion forums do to me!!!

[mrswah]

Horrible what they did to CJ, they got punished heavily for this and rightly so.  Don’t think Tabak received any compensation for reporting untruths?

And even today there is still a lot of horrible stuff about CJ still online. I suppose it can't be deleted?

[Real justice]

And even today there is still a lot of horrible stuff about CJ still online. I suppose it can't be deleted?

Ive watched The honour of Christopher Jefferies several times now mrswah, such a honourable man, he wasn’t even bothered about going after the press at first.  One person I would love to meet would be him.

[nina]

You want to meet Chris Jefferies RJ? Just come to Clifton Village and you will see him doing his shopping !! Very mundane.

He moved from Canynge Rd after being released and I don't blame the poor soul.