Yes thank you Scipio for your instructions re the quote splitting. I will endeavour to retrieve this and re-read it. You are so masterful 
The silencer didn't just have blood inside did it? It supposedly had blood, paint and hair on the outside so if it was a carefully planned murder, as you state, why not run it under the tap and give it a good clean?
The evidence proves it was a planned murder. I didn't say anything about it being perfectly planned. Criminals get caught because they are stupid and don't plan perfectly. The simple fact there was planning demolishes the claim that Seila suddenly went crazy and had a psychotic episode.
Yes there was paint on the suppressor. Obviously Jeremy either didn't notice it or didn't think it had any significance. Likewise he either didn't notice the blood on it or didn't think it had any significance. It was such a small amount on the suppressor that they could not even get the blood type. He obviously though that putting it in the closet and telling them he left the gun sitting out without the suppressor was sufficient for them not to search for a suppressor and examine it. At first his plan worked. In any event he had no idea they would be able to obtain evidence from inside of it and to prove it was used in the murders or he would have cleaned it.
He also didn't bother to count out how many bullets were in the box of ammo he stuck in the kitchen. He told police it was full or near full when he placed it there. Obviously he didn't take a box that was full or near full it was only partly full but he didn't count how many were in it. Thus a box that according to his own testimony had 45-50 bullets was left out and supposedly the killer got the bullets from it. 25 bullets were used thus the box should have had between 20 and 25 bullets. It had 30 though. The suppressor was found with an ammunition carrier that had extra ammo in it. Quite obviously the killer used this ammunition carrier and the suppressor then put them away together in the closet. He took out the partial box of ammo and put it in th ekitchen to bolste rhis claim that Sheila went into a psychotic rage, found the gun and ammo sitting in front of her as she raged so she grabbed it and used it.
His planning quite obviously was not up to snuff though.
Your suggestion that Sheila put the suppressor away in the closet out of habit before killing herself is absurd. The only reason she would need to remove the suppressor is because the only way to kill herself with it attached was perhaps if she used her toe to push the trigger. Even that might not work it depends on how long her legs were and I have not seen any info on the relevant stats of whether that would work or not. If she had removed the suppressor to kill herself she would have simply left it in the bedroom not to have walked down to hide it in the closet with the ammo carrier. No matter who committed the murders they had to have obtained ammo from elsewhere. It was not coincidence the ammo carrier was next to the suppressor.
If Sheila had committed the murders there is absolutely no reason for her to put the suppressor and ammo carrier in the closet. There was no reason for the suppressor and scope to have been removed prior to the murders and it was routinely stored with them attached.
Jeremy lied when he claimed the gun didn't fit in the closet with the accessories attached. Jeremy also lied about his use of the gun prior to the murders. He initially claimed he had not used the gun the week prior to the murders. After his cousin testified he was the last to use it and he put it in the closet with the accessories attached then Jeremy changed his story. He claimed he had used the gun repeatedly the week before the murders. He claimed it sometimes had the suppressor and scope attached when he fetched it othertimes it didn't. He claimed that during that week his father sometimes removed the accessories but other times didn't. Jeremy claimed he used it as found he never added or removed accessories. This is a perfect gotcha moment like seen on television. Someone questioning Jeremy about this could say so were you lying then or are you lying now? Either he lied initially about not using it or was lying about using it. This is only one of many lies and changing claims in which he ensnared himself because he didn't plan good enough in advance about what to do or say.
The bottom line is that we are left with half-assed planning from either Jeremy or Sheila. Jeremy actually has a motive for the planning while Sheila didn't. Jeremy hiding the suppressor had an actual motive. Sheila would have no reason to go hide it or the ammo carrier. Sheila would have no reason to unplug the kitchen phone, hide it and then place the bedroom phone in its place. Jeremy did have a reason to do so. There is a whole lot more evidence against Jeremy but this alone is enough to severely undermine his frame job against Sheila.
I believe suicide is seen as a sin as far as Christianity goes but we know SC discussed suicide with not only her psychiatrist, Dr Ferguson, but also her ex-husband, CC, and a second cousin, Helen Grimster. I daresay others too. We also know SC did not stick religiously to the teachings of the bible/Christianity in terms of discussing suicide/ideation, sexual relationships and conception of children outside of marriage. We also know she placed great emphasis on her personal appearance. In any event Anne Eaton's witness statement (I read all yesterday and will post the relevant links later) are very telling regarding the buckets of clothing some of which she states were blood stained. It is absolute madness that these buckets were not removed by EP and passed to FSS for analysis. It is simply not good enough for anyone to dismiss them out of hand as being connected to SC's period. Based on personal experience and that of family and friends, females just do not leave menstrual stained clothing in soak in buckets in the kitchen. AE states there were three buckets. She identified two pairs of pants (panties to you and Misty's owner) and a pair of leggings. We know June was very PROPER and it goes against the grain that she would have all this hanging around with the twins running about, NB and JB turning up at WHF at the crack of dawn for work. He apparently always visited WHF first thing in the morning to discuss the day's work with NB. Would you want your soiled underwear on display in the kitchen? The fact is we have absolutely no idea what was in the buckets and it strikes me threre's every likelihood it was SC's blood stained clothing from the tragedy.
You are the one claiming Sheila changed her clothing and took a bath for religious reasons. I challenged it by pointing out murder and suicide are sins and a religious person would expect to go to hell for such acts and moreover a soul moves on not clothing or bodies so the notions she would wash her body so it could be nice and clean when it arrives in heaven and her clothing would be nide and clean when it arrives in heaven make no sense and indeed are absurd.
The only excuse you can provide for why Sheila would change her clothes and wash before committing suicide is for an absurd reason. You can't think up anything that makes sense let alone prove anything.
Eaton looked in the buckets and only found blood in 1 bucket. Had she seen blood in more than one bucket she would have said so. Thus your speculation that others had blood inside are unwarranted and completely lacking in any support.
No one knows where these buckets were originally at the time of the murders. No one knows where they normally left buckets that had clothes soaking. By the time the clothes were found peopel had already been cleaing up the house to remove everything and things had been moved around quite a bit including many boxes of things being packed up and moved around.
If the contents of these buckets were in fact 3 pairs of panties and a pair of leggings how does this establish she changed her clothing after the murders? Why would she need 3 pairs of panties and how would panties get blood form the victims on them? Even leggings would be unlikely to have any blood fromt he victims. A shirt or gown would have most evidence that needed to be washed away especially gunshot residue. Someone firing a rifle will get GSR on their hands and their shirt or gown if wearing a gown.
GSR doesn't just magicly vanish on its own. She can't have fired the gun 25 times without getting GSR on her upper clothing. Similarly spatter from the bludgeoning would be on her gown or shirt mainly.
What evidence is there that she had a different gown or shirt on earlier that night? None.
What reason would she have for changing her clothing before killing herself? None.
What reason to take a bath to wash away GSR and any blood form Nevill that might have gotten on her fromt he bludgeoning? none
What evidence that she committed the bludgeoing by way of damage she suffered from the broken stock or the scuffle itself? None.
Jeremy wasn't tested for GSR or blood evidence nor was he inspected for wounds. Sheila was and tested negative for everything.
You keep making things up that demonstrate desperation.
